Show d I ro AFFIRMED I 1 ONE REVERSED m sm tI Estate of Moroni Williams Scores Victory in Ii the thc Case Against ct et a al I BEATS BEOK II I h V hicks Wins Win on ott Appeal in Dam Hilm Damage tn age Suit Snit the th he South cm ern Pacific Pact fi c t Three handed down by bythe bythe the curL r this thin morning two of which were Vre ot at the tho Judg Judgments judgments ments of oC tho the trial trini courts an 1 ono One was wasn was wasI n tI I reversal re In III the oase ot of Ito nf nt the estate of oC Moroni deceased v 11 J 3 T ii J Ullmer ft t l tI I j III ill o U J Salisbury up all tho tim judgment of oC the lower court I IK III This TIA In IA 1 the tho second v of ot hi tho the mo court On the tIu ol al the th Judgment of oC non unit suit granted by hy t tho the lower loor court w nf oC after aCtor which plaintiff tiled filed it n new suIt cult The action nu brought In this coun county ty h to recover from Cram defendants deC the sum of oC MOD tOO alleged to bo In tho tim balance duo due dueon on tIC tle price pf pt C tho the claim under ni entered Into rito In hi 1882 It 11 18 l Unit defendants tho the title to tho the property 11 hold It for Cor or a n nominal mini suto I to the stewart Stew Stow Stewart art Mining company of nt o which they thoy wem eru In III control Afterward they Joined with company tIlY In III the calo nIo 10 of d the claim with sItt other rs for Cor the sum mini of oC n tOO They FIny to pay 10 tho tile balance of ot the tho original purchase price out of ot tho the I money received for or the nalo olo te of oC tho the claim Hy fly welling Helling Il It for C r u II nominal sum um tn tO the company I they the contended thoy tho till dill not receive nil stint of o money mollOY for Cor It n ml refused to tn pay the of tho the purchase price irke On the second I Judgment wn wall rendered In III favor favorI nor I of oC plaintiff t ft for Cor tha tho t tot full I amount ii t tJ J Defendants 1 nIsI rained NI the tho points that Hint v the Judgment of at o was ies 1011 ie nd 81 4 of o tho the action and atul that It U was 1111 barred by the tho o limita limitations I These Thes points the tho court holds aro are pot lint well taken the Judg uncut of if tho the lower court In III ts II Tho I ha opinion of o tho the court was written by h Justice McCarty concurred In by Chief Justice Justice Bartch however howe r front from tho the opinion lot the majority of or th thu court Vii s CI rite Tha judgment of or tho lower court In Inthe the tho caso COHO of o M t L Ii I vo Va 11 tho the JuI Bul JuIa a Champion Mining com appellant was also aist by bythe bytho bythe the tho supreme court In III an opinion writ written written written ten hy by Justice McCurty McCarty and concurred In lit by hy Chief Justice and Justice Ju The action wan n brought to re ye recover cover for personal Injuries re received 1 hy by h plaintiff Ill while employed In defendants on Juno JUliO 21 2 I Judgment was sits rendered In the ttO court below III In favor of plaintiff for tor S 1605 mid cot costs of ot milt Plaintiff while panning through tho the tunnel going to Ills his work vork ork f stepped upon it II defective plunk which broko with him hlll and ho fell a II distance of or l H 14 feet and wax badly hadl Injured Tho flie judgment awarded him Is 19 by bythe b bythe the tho supreme court HICKS WINS ON APPEAL In the tho co o of ot M I W V Hick appellant va II tho the Southern company the judgment of ot nonsuit granted by tho the lower court Is reversed by IJ tho the court and lint the case cne Is 1 remanded with instructions to it and grant a now itow IIO trial trini The null RUIt was brought In county coun to recover 1999 dam dam for tor personal Injuries received by plaintiff In III tho the employ of oC defend defendant lint ant company as 08 a IL u hand on May Ma MaS i 8 S 1900 1000 The Tho accident happened near hear Ogden arid and occurred plaintiff ami other l cs worn vorn attempting to un unload Unload load lond Home onie heavy rails mils from Crom n a handcar In A iI hurry hUH so 80 SI MH tt II to clear tha trick track to prevent a 11 collision coli IRion with a II passenger train In III the hurry hurt and excitement one ona of ot the tho men inca dropped ItiN hili end of ot tho tue rail t arid It fell ell on Ott plaintiff Injuring Mm bun MmA bunA A judgment of o nonsuit was 1111 rendered ron erell In favor of at defendant by the tho court bo be bolow below low lo but bUl this thin judgment Is 18 reversed by bythe Urn the supreme court III In an 1111 opinion writ written tort ten by Chief Justice Nankin and con In lit by IJ Justice McCarty Kartell nio dissents from rom tho tue opinion In this case ellse |