OCR Text |
Show ( 1 Thursday, July 12. 1979 Page 9 Members of the Rossi Hill Homeowner's Association, who outlined development concerns in a petition to the City Council, were assured at the July 5 Council meeting that an upcoming comprehensive com-prehensive Park City master plan update will address many of their problems. The petition was presented to Mayor Jack Green and members of the City Council June 19, and was signed by 13 Rossi Hill residents and aster Plan Update Will Include Rossi Complaints property owners. The concerned con-cerned citizens told the council that several major problems need be ad-dresssed ad-dresssed before further developement is allowed on the hillside. Among the concerns listed were road access, fire hazard associated with the limited road access, density presently allowed, traffic and zoning ordinances of for the area. At last Thursday's council Legal Notice Separate sealed BIDS for the construction of (briefly describe nature, scope and major elements of the work) Sidewalk Improvement. Including In-cluding Sidewalks Curb and Gutter (8th to 15th Street) will be received by Park City Municipal Corporation at the office of City Clerk until 2:00 p.m., (Daylight Savings Time) July 16, 1979, and then at said office publicly opened and read aloud. The CONTRACT DOCUMENTS may be examined at the following locations: Park City Municipal Corporation, 528 South Main Street, Park City, Utah 84060 office of City Manager, Bush and Gudgell, Inc. Consulting Engineers 555 South 3rd East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111. Copies of the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS may be obtained ob-tained at the office of Bush and Gudgell, Inc. located at 555 South 3rd East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 upon payment of $40.00 for each set. Any BIDDER, upon returning retur-ning the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS promptly and in good condition, will be refunded his payment, and any non-bidder upon so returning the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS will be refunded refun-ded $20.00. meeting, City Planner David Preece noted, "The City Council and Planning Commission Com-mission currently are arranging for the revision and update of the city's master plan. That will give us quantitative information about Rossi Hill and other hillside areas, like upper Norfolk. In mid-July there will be a joint meeting of the two boards to select a consultant, con-sultant, and hopefully the work will be done by Christmas, Christ-mas, with the revisions to the master plan made by the spring of 1980. In the interim, I urge the City Council to work with the Planning Commission to find temporary tem-porary solutions to the Rossi Hill problems." Rossi Hill property owner Ron Whaley told the council, "The hill is very delicate. And right now the dedicated streets cover only about 10 percent of the improved streets. There are some terrific problems up there that need attention, and the city is the only policing power that can straighten them out." Among the biggest concerns con-cerns is access to Rossi Hill. Presently, there is the two-lane two-lane Rossi Hill Road currently curren-tly under construction, limiting access to the hill. One new project already has been approved for the area, and residents fear cars may park directly on Rossi Hill Road, reducing it to a one-lane one-lane road that would severly limit snow removal and emergency equipment. The other access to the hill is Ontario Road, which exceeds ex-ceeds a 20 percent grade on its north and south end, and is only 12 and a half feet wide in one place. The road connects with Rossi Hill Road by way of an unimproved unim-proved railroad bed that is impassable in the winter. Councilman Richard Martinez Mar-tinez suggested that the access ac-cess problem could be dealt with by extending Ontario south on a more reasonable grade by following the lines of the existing, unimproved railroad bed out to Highway 224 at the mill site. "That property belongs to United Park City Mines, and I think it would be really feasible to acquire the property trom them and extend ex-tend Ontario," Martinez commented. Commentary turned toward zoning on Rossi Hill. Resident Pete Alvarez noted that current zoning allows for fourplexes as a con ditional use in the area. He told the council that developers need only provide two parking spaces per unit, for a total of eight spots in a fourplex. He commented com-mented that in many cases a fourplex could house four persons per unit, each with a car, for a total of 16 cars. "In the winter the cars would have to park on the roadway," Alvarez said. "That is a dangerous situation for fire and emergency vehicles. We suggest the area be down-zoned down-zoned to allow only duplexes." Downzoning requires a public hearing and lengthy meetings and discussions. Councilman Steve Dering suggested the Planning Commission could deny conditional con-ditional use applications on the basis of its impact on the health, welfare and safety of the hillside residents. "In the meantime, we will present a letter to the Planning Plan-ning Commission along with the petition, and ask them what could or should be done to solve these problems," Mayor Green said. "I think most of us are aware of the situation. It's not new it's about 70 years old, and we'll see what we can do about it." m u-.j , n 0&L 4eiBT i nm,,,,,,. If l A III . . &td 251 Park Avenue Excellent older home on 2 city lots 4 bedroom, 1 bath, pantry, covered porches 1200 square feet. $85,000 SiilbscFibe! Park City Community Church SUNDAY SERVICE 10:00 a.m. ALL FAITHS WELCOME! 402 PARK AVENUE ft festal q 'mium !Sim IS 3. 01 s NEW LOCATION for SUMMIT T.V. Brent C. Hill Building (across from the Holiday Inn) Complete T.V. and Home Entertainment System Service 649-8070 We accept MasterCharge VISA toymitai amoei CO CO CO CO BE V ? S CO I s i S I t 1 1 i if 1 CO S CM sfcii r q? cd rates remain a the lowest in the natioif CO in c; lt) PI T I I CM 00 Pi iif pi ill las 111 CD CO ' O in 1 CO A CD I m 111 II ill II I II I You can save even more money by using natural gas wisely. MOUNTAIN FUEL For Fifty Years. People Serving People CO m d o s I 8 CO n CD co CD Qi CM o t- CD m ci m 10 10 00 . co CO co cJ (J) CO CD u-J oo co 00 CD CM CO d co 1 ; SJkA ilwS KferlixS SJisswrf o t o co - o co i- . CO $08 1 T3 ICSI n a m a (8 tfl i o H 111 Hi III til 9 0 o p sz 0) co 0) c o CO I m o 111 111 o w o o o O c (d ; o co & H 3 (L (fl IE D. W I O W DOCQ CD c5 O O CO o o 03 CO Q CU JK .V- sr CO - U. U4 Jg CD CO ?:0 ctJ CO 0 O Q CO () j O co cd CO CO DC rCs CD CO CD CL b CD CO CO Comparison of Mountain Fuel Supply Company GS-1 Rate with Other Residential Rates in the United States Based on monthly gas consumption ot Mountain Moun-tain Fuel Supply typical residential customer using 1 80 Mcf per year (875 Btucf) and rates in effect February 1, 1979. |