Show METROPOLITAN ST RY flY PUT IN RECEIVERS HANDS New N w York Oct 1 The Metropolitan tan Ian street railway was wan AM placed pieced cs In the hand hands of ot receivers receiver today on motion mollon ot tr IU its It own attorneys attorney that it II be made a Q party defendant to the receivership re recently ordered the New York City Railway Hallway company compAn The latter latler latterI I la is lessee lewee le of or the Ine lines tf r the company under tinder a Mo guarantee of or the tho Ihei i lease to 10 pay t 7 P per r ont cant nl dIvidends on the Metropolitan stock tock The Metropolitan Metro Metropolitan O litan IUan IUd did not nut earn this Ibl and tile the New York City Railway company tout lost In excess U of or through tho the It lea Pt Rut t Jackson begun an action today calling for tor the lion tion of the th New few fork Tork City Railway Hallway c and for the appointment of ur a ar receiver r lver fur for the Metropolitan Street Hallway t The application wa made before the state stat supreme court coun while receivership ac actions a lions tion had hod hll been taken before a federal court Justice Non Noni granted an order for the companies to show how cause calM why the special actions should hould not be granted grantell and also 1110 granted an order for officers of the Ih company to 10 show ho cause whether they should hould nut not render an n accounting The all g 8 that I the th management of the two Iwo have Ita r wasted about aboul or have hv not n l Recounted for a urn sum amount amounting amounting ing InK to 10 7 This charge har was all made maJe by b the In connection with an entry on the company books for tor 1801 amounting to lg 7 for far laying new rails ralla The charge that title thin num putu amounting am to about I l r mile Is III I more mort than ier mil mile milIn milIn In excess of or what would b be a reason able abi and fair ro cost t for Or such uh work It 1 Is Ie further charged that the defend defendant fend ants ant reported to th Ih the elate railway corn com commissioner missioner Jun June M N 1991 1901 that the amount due du from subsidiary COmp companies on that date Ita Ie wa wu 2598 and that th the following ear the balance from tb the teMer Ier companies an as of ot June M 30 1901 was tate l to 10 be S Th rh The defendants have never hover account accounted lt ed ad I for Cor the tile difference e of or says mys the lb petition I of ot the Further charges are made by the at It 1 eral among them one that In the company claimed that I per mile mIlt was exacted fur for changing track Ira k kon on the street line |