Show M MOVE f TO DISMISS BORAH CASE GASE Made by Defense at Conclusion Of Argument by Attorneys for the CLAIMED WAS NO EVIDENCE Il nm 1 unto lIRO V So but fur for Ml by 11 11 i IIA in Oct Dot I Federal Judge Jud pi r f irl fJ r i xv at the thela i nd Stat Stati fi e W B L irli la H Frail 11 TI I t clde tomorrow morn mom 11 rk ck or not U th the MIS no 1 i t taken from th jury and nd ind indr If r r acquittal ordered by bJ th thi the ur I i ho h conclusion of or th the KOV gov gO gOm m pe today the dill en eni JIM 11 v i i Hun for tor on tha thi thir r f I 11 no evidence to lo lon n Borah with a land landI fr I y had been T 1 a n wall uis at length len th by byi I i i m Huah and Burch Burchi Ill I i 1 urns In 11 H Hawl for the d de dew w tr Doral counsel h hed ed t i n tig on the mo mot moi II tl t i i Mr Hawley declared he hO heA A 1 h hae o II kIll IK It all had hd It II f eO M i t I him that the r hat had cither Intentional A much of i i nn in h ht f re the court coun The not II Jf reent ent during the argi arp M II 1 uMi tuh u ill in opening the r K saId Hid th that t there I h been tangible evidence f d I i rI on the time part of or a II tOW few I II it t 1 li Ht and In thie view u II said Mid he hI coincided 7 1 Senator Horan i Mr Hush flush Md Hd TrI i Put Iut ui tended to 10 show aho that the IH I rt t acted In I concert with the h i i k il 1 to 10 the ex exi i of Qt receiving In ilk his of ot otI I li Ids cds resulting from fraud traudI HI i ir nip IiiI Ih e deed recorded cor ed at al Ill PL t This Thie act Ret of or the defend r I t II Ir i Hush HUh asserted placed him himi in tn n i i i ut f t one who receives stolen etolen pI K and required an tl tI 1 url loll urged that there i i ugh t i t H tilt t I defendant upon hi his hie an anin v in l 1 argued that thal an attorney y 1 i K above the tims ordinary ordinal n ll of r tn th i United Stated T i wh h l 11 home of ot securing the thel IheI l I f i M I n i luh i t ti declared reeked racked II v j H the defendant aa lIB lIBI e er it I r i tru r mu must t ha hae e had knowl know knowlI I nf r U r the till government t f i i Ir H it strong case CAM he h con eon coni i l j I 1 A at it ii n t the tho question but the thet it t sli ul uli Inquire only It If there thre t II i r f fri ea i H i t to 10 establish eata lIh a ai aIL i II IL r I f r possible guilt Mi Mr I I 11 U kv I Ik y replying chug op 01 opI sin I I Linn n l 1 wit Ii an CU of or the law II 11 lie said ald Id they Iha M rc r preding r on the theory that thal fi OI prove In int nt 11 t than Ihan the v I J pro provi him hIni guIlty Every v ui in In Iii 11 the tho evidence Idenie must mut be he her bet i r f t the th defendant Every act r i norh tort We to which the vl d i T r a l wee was w hown shown to 10 be beI beh I iri h t and In t li I in M t of nf pur lUrIO oi Every Ivery fi IM I k ii b by the Ih defendant wee the f 4 i Hon of or n an attorney pro h of oC lit his lla client cUenl cud and v I i 1111 1111 10 of cf no other Miter t I HI i Mi If I r HM claimed that the theM thet M l I if t the thc own II U IU 1111 a to to IC the effort that Sen Son SonI ii 1 i i li h a I Announced thai that he hei heits II d i ik ax its and an 1 that hi hie ii i i l us I tu tJ protect hg hi client the I 1 lumber company from fromi M ac acl 11 i l Imi tainted t by fraud 1 n h 1 of ot the mba argument J L U announced angioUni that UIt he heu hev v u i td 1 1 th tIll matter under advice 11 tL i i nt 01 l i inner hi hie tomor r i L i IHK 1111 fl I ih II h as Re I to the Ih re rei r i ii 11 1 In b I ut nt itt II r nue t of s S it i ih h wa cum fl lui Judg n nr U 1 ill d 1 h lu s I a ac aa tO the witness L I a U Chapman haan of th Ih the Lumber oom nom pan nii ho h on vc f retailed refaced lo to produce r certain re r iu I It on the t ground that they ther HI might h ml to Incriminate him There I Ii f u n IK III v nowadays Mid acid ld J lu id M Whit ii to t win wi wipe out nut i a but wt It Is III a movement i hi hiv n no with It mar maj ma b t the he t h Constitution to II wrong anil I i should b he elm II t ti t 1111 r himself hut but so ao o long 10 MI ee th the Constitution Is Ia what It k I t intend In to uphold l hol It The in n of r f the Is I a n ed in one once before ws w upheld b tI the th rai courts court l In refusing to Irl du th thi books book Former John T ot of Idaho was wa a Ill today todar If ife 1111 said Borah earn came to him while gover governor governor r nor and mu a to In certain timber lands th Ute the Mat aid expected to tn claim In a peel 4 Motion H lie wanted to know U it th the slat LAte could not select t Its It land elsewhere r or nr reduce redu the th amount It elPe to 10 claim Goy Gov Morrison WM ene not |