Show COURT NEWS t In the Fourth Judicial District Court of ot the State of ot Utah in and for Uintah County February 9 1977 1971 before Judge David Sam State of ot Utah vs Ted Roloff The court continued this matter to February 24 1971 1977 The State of Utah vs Boyd Claude Winn This matter came before the court for Cor t termination ter r- r of probation It was the order of the court that probation be terminated State of Utah vs David Joseph Murtha Upon request of both counsel the court ordered this matter remanded to the court for trial State of Utah vs David Arvon Arvin Cannon and William Odell Ransom Trial date has been reset for July 15 IS 1977 1971 at am a.m. In the Matter of the Estate of Lynn Richens aka 0 0 O. Lynn Richens This matter came before the court on a petition for final distribution No objection the account is approved distribution is ordered as prayed for the attorneys fees and administrators fees are fixed and allowed as prayed for Nellie Richens is released from her trust upon proof of distribution In the Matter of the Estate of Robert V V. V New This matter came before the court on a petition for approval of assignment of oil and gas leases first and final accounting accounting accounting ac ac- ac- ac counting and final distribution No objection the account is approved distribution is ordered ordered ordered or or- dered as prayed for the Auxiliary executor is discharged from his trust upon proof of distribution Department of Employment Security of the Industrial Commission of Utah vs Clark L. L Riverside Petroleum Club Upon the recommendation of the plaintiffs plaintiff's counsel the court ordered the matter dismissed and the bond returned to defendant Department of Employment Security of the Industrial Commission of Utah vs Mays May's Great Basin Construction Defendant was not present Upon request of plaintiffs plaintiff's counsel an order to show cause may issue Fay Glenda Rob vs Vat Vs Billy Gene Roberts This matter came before the court for hearing Defendants Defendant's exhibit No 1 l was was marked Both counsel addressed the court representing that the parties are in agreement with the stipulation with an added provision that the child support payments are to be made to the Duchesne County Clerks Clerk's office The court received the exhibit and instructed counsel to file a stipulation in accordance with their representations to the court Antje Antic Ingeborg Knudson vs Jay 0 O. Knudson This matter came before the court on an order to show cause Plaintiffs Plaintiff's counsel moved to dismiss the order to show cause and the court so ordered Central National Insurance Group of Omaha vs Uintah Cattle and Trucking Inc This matter came before the court courton on a return on a bench warrant Upon a motion of plaintiffs plaintiff's counsel the court ordered the matter dismissed Wash Wash Wash-A-Matic A Matic Inc vs Delyle Billings Arvin Billings et al This matter came before the court on a motion to assess damages The court continued this matter to February 24 1977 Luther J. J Alford vs Linda Reynolds Alford This matter came before the court on plaintiffs plaintiff's motion to have the matter referred to the Division of Family Services for a home investigation Defendants Defendant's counsel represented to the court that he does not know defendants defendant's defendants defendant's defendants defendant's dant's present address and may withdraw as counsel if he cannot locate the defendant It was the order of the court that a ahome ahome ahome home study be made of plaintiffs plaintiff's plaintiffs plaintiff's plaintiffs plaintiff's plain plain- tiffs tiff's home and an attempt to be made to locate defendant so that a home study may be conducted Colleen and the State of Utah by and through Director Assistance Payment Utah State Dept of Social Services vs Marvin This matter came before the court on an order to show cause The defendant was present and stated he had not paid support payments in accordance with the decree but had ad not been allowed visitation rights It was the order of the court that judgment may enter against defendant in the amount of Marilyn Gardiner vs Dale Christy Gardiner This matter came before the court on a return on a bench warrant A n. n stipulation agreed to by both parties was approved by the court and may be made a part of the order A hearing as to a possible change of ot custody of the parties' parties year old ld son Is continued nied to February Department of ot Employment Security of ot the Industrial Commission of Utah vs S Hiko Bell Mining and Oil Company Upon request of plaintiffs plaintiff's counsel this matter is continued continued continued con con- without date Patricia Jean vs S Durmont This matter came before the court courton on an order to show cause It was the order of oC the court that the child support payments be reduced by effective on the date of the childs child's marriage Counsel for the defendant stipulated that defendant is delinquent It was the order of the court that tha t judgment may enter for plus attorneys fees fecs and costs Counsel for the plaintiff requested an increase in the support payments for the remaining minor child Plaintiff and defendant were instructed through counsel to submit an affidavit regarding the increase in support payments which will be heard on March 30 1977 Upon request of counsel for plaintiff the court will hold the matter of contempt in abeyance James E. E Allan vs Cheryl A. A Allen This matter came carne before the court for a hearing of a default divorce The court finds that plaintiff is entitled to a decree of divorce to become final on May 9 The stipulation and agreement dated November 1 I 1976 is approved and may be made a apart apart apart part of the decree of divorce Vicki Gardner vs Brud Gardner This matter came before the court for hearing of a divorce The court finds that plaintiff is entitled to a decree of divorce to become final in three months from the date of signing and entry in the records of the clerk of the court The stipulation and property settlement settlement settlement set set- agreement dated November 12 1976 is approved and may be made a part of the decree Marie Hackford Collett vs Jack Collett This matter came before the court for hearing of of a divorce The court finds there is good cause and waives the balance of the 90 day waiting period and that the plaintiff is entitled to a divorce from defendant to become final in 30 days from the date of signing and entry in the records Relief is granted as prayed for in the complaint It was the order of the court that defendant shall not visit the minor child or plaintiff at any anytime anytime anytime time in a drunken condition Colleen Colton vs Edward Colton This matter came before the court on defendants defendant's motion to modify the order of the court dated December 8 1976 It was the order of the court that the defendant shall be required to pay per month rather than per month as previously ordered The jail sentence was reduced from 10 days to 5 days in the event the monthly payment is not made payments include support arrearage property settlement Defendant is given credit for for December January and February to be applied on the arrea arrearage rage Wilma Miller vs James Miller This matter came before the court on an order to show cause A stipulation was stated into the record Plaintiffs Plaintiffs Plaintiff's Plaintiffs Plaintiff's Plain Plain- tiffs tiff's motion was granted by the court as to a restraining order and temporary custody etc The stipulation tion was accepted by bythe bythe bythe the court Larry and Ealine Gurr vs Harold Carlisle Jr Carlisle Chevrolet Oldsmobile Upon review the Judge set this matter for trial on February 24 1977 to follow law and matter Dennis Charlesworth and Judy Charlesworth vs Douglas A. A Finlay and A. A C C. C Robbins Utah Company Upon review of the request for a Trial Setting for February 24 1977 at am a.m. I R I-R R equipment Corporation vs Bill Martins Martin's Drilling Inc a Utah Corporation Corporation Cor- Cor and W. W D D. Martin Individually Upon review the Judge requests a Trial Pre-Trial in inthis inthis inthis this matter February 24 24 1977 at am Harvey Carlisle Carlisle Chevrolet OId- OId Oldsmobile vs Ernie Buist Ernies Ernie's Con Con- Upon review the judge set this matter for trial February 24 1977 to follow law lawand lawand lawand and motion calendar Belle Pitt vs Randy D D. Beers This was the time set for trial Trial was not herd heft because ou counsel el advised the court that the case had been settled |