Show HIGH COURT I WILL HEAR KANSAS CASE That Agreed On No Matter What Denver Decision May Be DENvER DENVER Cob Colo Sept 14 The H.-The The Kansas presidential electors electors case wa was taken taken- under under under un un- un- un der advisement ad In the United States district district dis dis- dis circuit court of appeals today It is fa expected a mand mandate te will be handed hand hand- ed d down wn next Monday Tho The case It IB is Ie agreed will win be appealed ap ap- ap- ap pealed ped to the United States supreme court If It the tho Kansas Kansas' stat statutes expressly provided Provided pro pro- vided that a a. state officer should certify fraudulent nominations such statute statute would not riot justify the tho state officer In SO so doing because It would be void on Its face tace waa sas the final point In the closing argument tod today y by D D. D R. R Rite representing the Taft supporters Mr lute dwelt upon tho the similarity between be be- tween the right of n. n citizen to participate In tho election of or a R member of con congress es and the right of that citizen to participate pate III hi the naming of presidential elec dee tors tore Ho cited an opinion of the United States supreme court which held that the theY right to participate In the election ejection of a a. member of congress s Is a valuable franchise fran Iran chise and Injury to this right gives action action ac ac- ac tion for money dama damages es and contended that the same con conditions applied In tho the present case The case casc IB Is an Injunction proceeding brought by supporters of President Taft to prevent Charles H. H Sessions secretary tary of state of or Kansas from certifying the names name of eight presidential electors who declared th their lr Intention of voting for Theodore Theodoro elt for tor a place placemen on on the regular Republican ballot It was brought up from the United Sta States dIstrict district district dis dIs- dis- dis court on an appeal from the Ule decision decision deci dod sion slon or Judge W W. II H Sanborn who Jl ruled d that a a. court of equity h had no Jurisdiction tion In the matter malter |