| Show ES S DK LAWYERS nS And AmI How They Arc Sometimes t fully rull Abused In lit a 11 criminal criso r e o e on nn trial a doctor WAS vu questioned as Ull to the causes of et death teath After t enumeration of Qt ninny Causes c direct Indirect the lag In Judge naked asked Did you ever eVIr hear lien of ot death by The rime Question ws wa anti and timely Under our lax practice cole code lawyers on both bolh sides tides of cases ale ate permitted permit Ie to trot over the physical Im Immaterial material world In lit of ot rt real l or Information which often otten has hi no nut conceivable bearings on the Issue In lauds where a i more moore thorough edu education education cation for Cor law Is required r as 1111 preliminary ary nry to to the bar such uch vaga ala vagabonding vagabondIng bonding Is III unknown Causes tire arc pre Pro prepared pared with precIsion outside the ju judicial JUdicial precincts They arc are presented with scientific simplicity and lucidity to judge or Jury or both Irrelevant In Iii would call upon the guilty lawyer a u judicial rebuke which would cost him his clients American license maintains n a seri erl seriously son low standard In tho the legal I gal profession prot stun sion Little general or specific education tion Is demanded before admission to 10 the bar Once In there Is 18 no ito bulwark against t which es Os escapes capes penal penn I statutes A lawyer Jawer may violate ethics habitually but If IC un uncaught Uncaught caught he ht HOGS gates on to the end cud In entices on trial he ho may Insult In brow browbeat browbeat beat Jell I bully hully calumniate witnesses lies with without without without out effectual protect before the tha average vernse Judge Many of or the questions tire are malignant In lit their nut pur pones to obscure or pervert truth Many aro aio Insidiously designed d to 1111 jurors Juron with prejudice against l a liti 1111 litigant gant In order to defraud him Irrelevancy vancy ancy In Is tolerated tol by II judges to the degree of ot barbarity It If n ft question be not honestly relevant to t the pending Issue win why should It be allowed If It not Int to the this Judge how holl can he It to 10 be he so to the Jury jur Tho rIte purpose J e of ot such ques questions Is hI dishonest It 11 Is II upon the character r of or the tho Judge ju g to allow them It Is not ll that opposing coun counsel sal sel M should save an objection tot for use useIn on In appeal The TIte worst W feature of ot diR dIn dishonest honest Is I that It compels litigants to 10 seek e k In higher courts court tho the rights rl to which they are en cn entitled entitled titled In the trial trl ll court hue ThU abuse e Is II In the courts of this country Death by b Illation Is not often recorded In the coroners but of 01 proper property ty t violation of or constitutional rights right through dishonest occur our dally daily in the courts Chicago Chronicle |
