Show thUU lilt PAt ast Mormonism th the at o the alleged of a 0 between the tha United States and Utah hAt has discussed by the lire lr ot of the tho country It Is reo re how few tew of tin the great Jour Journ n ails taken n 1 a constitutional Ww v vot ot of SUbject V by the prejudice up against the majority ot of the of this State they ore ure and therefore supposed to tobe tobe be t many mariy editors otherwise have havo appeared to any e that might b started 1 with n a view IrI to the of the Mormon Jormon people when hen the suggestion was mado by the tle inveterate enemies of the that Utah might be thrust out of the Union on ma the alleged ed ground grooM thet sn hu broken her compact fUh the goy goo nt on list her entrance Into the UnIon it Il was seized n as n a welcome pretext and advocated RI as n a practical solution of the problem of to this matter the Du Des Deseret eret News II line II usually put FUl the word compact In quotatIon was for tor the tho the term tenn used was a nM tid Implied something to the theory of aur ur system of government A State n entering the great Federation unites with lIh other free rree and and sovereign States tet nil alt on nn an equal tooting purpose of ofa n a now State In becoming one with the theother theother other StAtes b L the same lemO as 81 that of the thirteen n colonies all us enunciated Irs In the preamble to the tho ot of the United StateS V There Will was no compact or contract between the State of Utah and the United Slat States when the proclamation of the union lIh ith the sister States There were some Rome required by the Enabling Act similar to those provided for tor the admission of at other States with the tho nd ad mIllion dilion ot of a special prevision whIch has been many times quoted and comment ott upon That condition ns as well as the others wan wa tully fully 1 with In Inthe inthe the tramping of time State and the of the tho President was 1111 the rue recognition ot of that compliance It vu aa complete and perfect ne ac 1 by the of the nUion That Is the of t this ls Republic he discussion that line oce occurred OVer the compact question has developed U the tact fact that there l Is much Ignorance concerning the tho essential prIncIples of our national system of government Alt the tho talk violation ot of compact compactor or has been superfluous Utah Is n a ot Of the tho Union ai much r Now New York Thom Thore is II no Constitutional wa way to thrust her out Ot Of course there is 18 no necessity or real cause for tor any such notion If It ero possible under the tho Supreme JAw has observed In spirit o an voll as In letter leiter the under understanding standing d In th the specIal pro provision vision of the tha Act and the tho Constitution As s to tIme the principIa Involved In this matter motter we f direct special p attention to the tho remarks made by lIon Charles s l I In his great rent speech on the Pr Fr question which has hail b t pub published In full In the Doeer t from whIch wo reproduce time the pam pnra graphs that are submitted to tho tha con oon of nil all who entertain erratic notions concerning tho ho alleged com comPact Pact with the government Compact is 18 synonymous with con contract contract tract The Idea or of II a compact or is 18 not predicable upon the relations that b between tween the State Stale and the genera government They The do not In the 1 of contracting parties The Tho con dillon upon ullOn Utah was to become 1 it State was Wall full tul performed when she Bhe became it II State The l Act ct au the tho to determine when the condition wa was performed lie discharged that dut duty found that the condition was 1111 Compiled wIth And that condition nI no longer exists What dill did Congress require b by the Enabling Act Simply that said con bAil b by ordinance Irrevocable etc elc and the tho dId ditl dIdin In terms what It wa was requIred to do It was wall n a con condition upon the performance ot of whIch by bv the tho convention the ad ur of Utah depended Its accomplished its lis Is gone guno and as asa 1 a condition It ceases to exist No o was 11 reserved In the Mt t nor can Any 11 found In the tho Constitution of the United d authorizing Con greats not to 14 SN the tho house ot of alone 10 the people In or the tati or of Utah b because the crime of or unlawful hami not b been en In Utah mah h is 18 the warrant to be found for tor the exercise of thiS nry ary supervisory ower This theory is II evolved for tor time tho purposes of this Hili NIO asro is II entirely without And 11 has os not eve en the conJ conjecture or dream or of any writer to stand upon If It Is III suggested that the ClUe case of vs 8 White n 1 Wallace 10 lend mild or comfort to this Idl Idea I tM respectful respectfully I ly submit without stopping to analyze the oUt se that It II 10 bas based d uvon other grounds while the tho term compact is II mentioned but once It Is h then men for tor the purpose of showing that It was 11 not II a proper term to the relations exl existing between Ih the State and the Ibe federal government Au AI the tho court saId pal page Then therefore Tax Texas became ono one or of the states she Bhe entered into An indissoluble relation All 1 the oblige nOM ions ot of perpetual union tired Orid nil me guaranties of government In attached at on once co to the The rhe I at t r consummated pr tM Wu Was sonie thing than thail a compact It IL was the incorporation ot of a nN new member Into the l bod body antI ant It was final The union between Texas and the other States was wa n as complete as perpetuAl anit na In indissoluble as the union be betten States was rol for tor rl or ar lion except through or through consent of the States Slates II |