OCR Text |
Show eheep of defendenat rialntiff claimed he had acquired title to atreame of water flowing down eartaln oanyoni and defendants had no right to drlva their flocks oter hie land to (at tha animals 10 water. An appeal to tha supreme court may ba taken. It la understood. Interettinjr Range Decision Rendered 'Special fo The News.) BRIGHAM CITY. Jan. 11. The case of E. 8. Frost, vs John T. Better-Idge Better-Idge et si of Grouse Creek, which occupied oc-cupied the sttention of Judge A. A. Law and a Jury in the district court in this city all of last week,. came to an end early Saturday afternoon by the Jury bringing In a si dirt of "no I cause of action." ' Suit for 1I.001 was brought for al- 1 leged damage 10 range properly by |