Show SUGAR CASE IS 15 AGAIN IN COURT Utah-Idaho Utah Company Seeks J I Rehearing g I i In the supreme supreme court today argument argument argument ment was made 1 In the matter matte matter of the I rehearing of the case of ot the Utah- Utah Idaho Idah Sugar company concerning Intangible intangible intangible in tangible assets In Iii 1918 the assessor assessor of Salt Lake county included in his assessment of the Utah-Idaho Utah Sugar company an assessment assessment as assessment as- as of the intangible assets of the company placing the value thereon at The assessment was protested protested protested pro pro- pro pro- tested by the Utah-Idaho Utah company and the case was t taken ken to the Third district district district dis dis- dis- dis court which returned a judgment t in favor of the county From this I Judgment the sugar company appealed 1 to the supreme court After a hearing by the V supreme tribunal tri tribunal tri tri- bunal the tho appeal of the Third district court was upheld Insofar as the principal o of ot the assessment was made maie but it was was' held that the assessment made on the Intangible assets should be apportioned among the counties In ln which the property property property prop prop- erty of the company company was wis situated I This decision of the supreme court was assailed d by attorneys for the sugar company wh who petitioned the supreme court for a rehearing of the matter andas and andas as a reason reason for f r the petition alleged twenty grounds wherein the court is alleged to have erred in the judgment rendered Therefore the sugar company company com corn pany asks that the former decision of the court court be reversed Salt Lake county COUlty attorneys petitioned peti peU- for a a rehearing of ot that part pant of ot the f former decision of the supreme court which apportioned the assessment assessment assessment assess assess- ment among among arOng the counties In which the property of ot the sugar company l is lo located located lo- lo while opposing the petition of the company for a rehearing of the ap apI appeal appeal ap- ap peal of the company Argument was made today by T. T L. L Mitchell and C. C C C. Richards for the V county while the appeal of f th the Utah- Utah Idaho Sugar company is being made by Judge D. D N. N and Richard W. W Young The case is occupying the entire entire entire en en- tire day ay each side being given three hours in which to present argument |