Show FILED OVER FUNDS FOR PAVING I n DECIDE I IF f fUND MAY MA J Of BE OfU U USED D nth ath th Files Suit Against j vale City Salt Lake taxpayers payers May Be Af- Af by the Outcome IT D x to determine whether a amay ity ty may pay part of theof the theof 1 Rf of of paving a thoroughfare j i n nits i s limits out of the city's rat fund with without but creating special lal Improvement district has tIled Hied qed with the state supreme court courtw Wilmer w Booth of Midvale against le Ie City and John A. A Aylett t 1 of Mr Booth Boo Booth 1 already obtained from the supreme court t of f pr prohibition against the caro carout car- car put out o t by the city of a resolution some some weeks ago by which the would enter into contract with Lake to pay third one-third of cost cost of paving Center street gh to Midvale ALE COUNCIL MAY REFUSE uld the court decide that the city cannot pay part of the cost tut mt the creation of a special im- im ment district the Midvale city refuse to create the dis- dis since it is already on record the statement nt that residents of r street would not be more maly maly ma- ma 1 ly benefited by the pavement residents of Midvale generally ch cn event the county would have of constructing the ent nt and paying the entire cost refusing to pay that portion of Dad iad to Bingham canyon Should pay the entire cost of pay pay- twill tJ mean that the taxpayer of Lake take City who pays the entire of f paving state roads within its boundaries would be charged Just of corresponding wealth for tor the paving of the treet BRIDGE NECESSARY 3 reSOlUtiOn of the city council councils s that In addition to the repairs ler ad the city soon will have lda steel bridge across the Jorita Jort Jor- Jor ita t tta cost of It Is now sed that the city pay third one jost ost of both paving and bridge i 1 would total as Midi Mid Mid- J i portion r r. OF PROHIBITION j suit brought by Booth is for a of prohibition to prevent the city from entering Into a con- con with the county c regard to the paving The peti- peti the tor-the or the writ makes no mention of bridge over the Jordan reciting ithe Ith city's portion of the expense y 1152 for the paving alone should raised jl in accordance with what he jB Continued on pa page e 8 8 TO DECIDE I Continued from page 1 1 claims In the only method provided by bylaw law for raising money for pavements In In cities b by the creation of a special Improvement district The court is asked to prevent the money being taken from the general fund of the 1 city on the ground that it would raise taxes throughout houf the city as a |