OCR Text |
Show First District Court. The following business was transacted trans-acted In Judge Mincr'scourtycstcr-lay Mincr'scourtycstcr-lay at Ogden: In the case of Peck, ct al. vs. Recs, documentary evidence was introduced intro-duced and taken under advisement. By consent, the case of C. B. Wheeler vs. W. W. Waters was referred re-ferred to Judgu Borcman. The case of Slatting vs. Kerrin was referred to Attorney II. C. Rolapp. The case of Fitzgerald va. I. J. Barrat et al. was continued for the term. 0,;den City vs. John A. Boyle; judgment was rendered for plaintiff in the sum of $375.75 and costs. Dwlght Peck et aL vs. Cecilia Itees; judgment for plaintiff In accordance ac-cordance with decision filed. A stay of execution wa3 ordered for thirty days. Citizens' L'ght Co. vs. Joseph Cook; case dismissed al plaintiff's cost. The case of W. 6. McComlck vs. Logan City; referred to A. R. Hey-wo-jd witii instructions to report. The cae of Samuel Taylor vs. Hanuah Taylor; cae was referred to U. P. ileudersiu to report findings find-ings aud conclu-lons. lliecae of Uanniti Taylor vs. Samuel Taylor was continued for term. Taylor vs. CbrU-topheKon; on motion referred tu H. P. Hender-sju Hender-sju to report findings and conclusions conclu-sions ot law an 1 to report. The First National bank vs. Ogden City railway company; default entered en-tered against Rjbsrt Itoblnson; on motion of Kimball and Allison an J by consent of Smith and Smith, writ of attachment ngiinM Robert Rjblnton discharged and Robert itobinson by attorneys enters a waiver of right and iu attachment uniertaking, and judgment entered againstall defer Jams, according to prayer of comulaiuant. the Utah National Bauk vs. W. R Swan; on motion and by consent default eutered against Robert Rob-inon Rob-inon and attachiHentdiseoIvcd. Robinson, by his attorney, entered a waverof ri,bt aud action in attachment at-tachment undertaking, and entered judgment against defendants according ac-cording to prayer of complaint. The case of 11. II. Henderson et aLvs. Ogden City Railway Company Com-pany et al.; return of A. 11. Swan being sufficient, continued till Friday, Fri-day, (November H, at 10 a. m. Caroline Stratford vs. A. Stratford; order for decree of divorce on default de-fault of defendant. Taylor vs. Bufurd; ten days further fur-ther time was granted In which to file and prejare statement on motion mo-tion for a new trial. Below is the business done before Judge'Blackburn in the Provo division divi-sion of the First District Court yesterday: yes-terday: In the case of Mary A. May vs. Charles House, the jury returned a verdict for the defendant; plaintiff was given twenty days to tile a mo tion for a new trial. Amanda Marks vs.W. II. Culmer et al.; cross-complaint filed at defendant's de-fendant's cost. The cas of Neils L. Ellason vs. Henry L. DauieU et al.; dlmlssed. riie ca-c of rhomat Jarn.nu vs. Rio Granle Western Railway Company; Com-pany; dismissed at plaintiff's cost.; William H. Liter vs. Ozokerite Mining Company, on trial. Plain-tifTsuesfor$95, Plain-tifTsuesfor$95, alleged to bo due for services rendered in tbo employ of said company. Tliejury returned a verdict for the plaintiff for the amount claimed and defendant is granted thlaty days on a motion for a new trial. The case of Wilsou vs. JJrean-bruck JJrean-bruck et al.; an action In replevy by the Wilconsof Pason to recover the value of 504 sheep, with the lamba aad wool incidental thereto, alleged to have been unlawfully taken by Krcaubruck, went to the Jury who will probably report to-day. , |