OCR Text |
Show PROPERTY HOLDERS INTERESTED IN SUIT Another Action Begun to Compel Early Payment of Improvement Warrants. Application fr a writ ul mandate, compolli u;j l lie ci'y t n-ii -ure r to ell property to . I Uf y a pec ia 1 im proi o-ment o-ment ta in eae v, hero ;iiiv instiill ineiil oi the tax lia- heroine del inn, nenl . v,:p file-l in tiio district court vector -lav b K. N. ;it-on A o. of I'lula dolph i a, against Fran k I on I be, i - i t y troii-uror. An alternative writ, return able I emhej- 1, was i-sne-i bv Judu''' I . I K l.en This the se-uml attempt nf Hie I 'Ii i ladelj h ia bond brokers to force Salt Lake ( itv to depart trom its pra-dieo id waiting until all the installments oi n sj'e.ial impro einont :t hno become .li ! 1 1 o ' i ' nt befo- o .-ol'i nu t he propert ;' for ta e-.. ( in a pre ioi;. mi it, -arned throitL'h to the supreme court, tlie city won, but in this ea-o a point of law not involve.! in the previous suit has-been has-been rai-ed. Tlie eoinpanv contends that the policy pol-icy of the treasurer has deprived it of anv method of collect inn ou special im-pro im-pro oinent wa rrants which it hoi'is without wailhij five ear-- fr ten years, as the ca-e mav be. It iitp.t the citv ordinances, which provide that in ase one installment becomes delinquent, then all the in-t.-tllmetP shall bo declared dup and f-hsll b" ubiect to an im-reed rate of ititerc-t until paid or until so hi for taxes. This is The ).oint at jss.ie. The company contends that this provision pro-vision sustains its el aim that tlie property prop-erty shnu hi be sold when any installment install-ment becomes due. About 'J.iiun.uiiO in Suit Lake special improvement warrants are now out-stiimlin. out-stiimlin. the Stinson company holding a lare block of them through purchaser pur-chaser from P. .1. Mnran, to wliom hoy were issue.l in payment for public improvements. im-provements. Should the companv win in its latest action aL'aint the oitv the effect woubl be w idesprea.l. Tt is feared that it would work a hardship on many property prop-erty owners, but on the other hand it is argued that pneh a practice would bring the oitv "a warrants up to par. The citv commission recently decided to stand by the old method until compelled com-pelled to change by court prooeduio. |