Show The talk about Uibmb allly of mcSrllty the proposed l Issu0 of city bonds Is all aside from the question the bnfymatter queston o1 mfUer be fore the people > 1s I vJUliyvole the bonds or will they prefer to pay the 250000 In a special tax this yean Of course the bonding is to be preferred If The Council Is acting under competent legal advice and no point of illegality Js presumable ArilheiV tlifngj the baikfiro about alkIIC economics and POP r uoe of the money hut no place In this election for the economical use of tho money asked to bo voted IB fully guarded guard-ed by the use to which it must be put specifically as stated often In this discussion dis-cussion namely to enlarge and Improve Im-prove tho reservoir on the cast bench 30000 Improvements to mains in eastern imrt of city 75000 Parleys canyon land and water rights 60000 enlarging mains for City creek water 75000 a total of 210000 As has been explained before the contracts for all this work havo been let save only for tho Parleys canyon Item which Is a matter of close approximation I Is of no advantage to anybody to attempt to drag partisan rancor and frivolous I qucrulousncss Into the discussion I is simply a choice of how city obligations shall be paid whether by the Immediate levy of a special tax or by the Issue of bonds which will oblige those who In years to come will reap the benefit to pay part of the cost The bonds should I be voted |