Show I SIX JURORS OCR riQTrn Two Yet to Be Secured in the tfubbarcl Case J MANY JURORS HAVE OPINIONS Nearly One Hundred Jurors Have Been Examined to Date but Out of This Number but Sis Have Been Found That Are Satisfactory to Both Prosecution and Defense Box Will Probably Be Filed Today and Testimony Will Then Begin Cattlemans Wife Wants Freedom After nearly thirty additional Jurymen I Jury-men had been examined the second day I of the trial of W E Ilubbard the well I known real estate man on charges oC I I rape terminated yesterday with two i In the box seats still vacant jury sen sll I Foul new Jurymen were sworn In i during the afternoon session of court These who proved to be acceptable to I I both the prosecution and defense were II George E Maycoclc W T Powell Joseph H Snarr and L W Judges By the time they had taken their seats I i beside H Cooper and E S Lovesy who were accepted Monday however I la venire of fifty talesmen had I been exhausted A second additional venire made returnable at 2 oclock was under examination when the time for adjournment arrived Of the Jurors examined yesterday I none jycre found acceptable at the morning session Alan T Riley was challenged for cause by the State and I 1 I and was excused as were John Wll t illams John Deering Benjamin S I I i Gulver and Charles Brazier all of whom were challenged for cause by the defense In one caw that of George E Williams Wil-liams District Attorney Elchnor exercised exer-cised the right of peremptory challenge chal-lenge for the Statei and Mr AVllllams was excused I When the afternoon session of court began al went smoothly while George 33 Maycock W T Powell and Joseph H Snare were being examined They all proved acceptable Tnen the State struck a snag In the person of Fred G Hefron He was peremptorily challenged I chal-lenged by Mr peremptoriy I next the defenses turn to use the peremptory I per-emptory and it fell to the lot of the next candidate John Oliver to be re I jected thereby Fergus Coalter was excused ex-cused upon a challenge by l the defense for cause After L W Judges the next candidate candi-date had been examined and accepted there was n run of bad luck for the rest of the day The defonse challenged five venlremen one after another because be-cause they had read the papers and famed opinions adverse to the defendant defend-ant They were Charles Samson C J Foulger G R Raleigh J W Houston Hous-ton a real estate man who said he was an extremist in criminal cases I and Lorin Morrison J L Perkes said he had been good friends with Hubbard I for ten years and was challenged by the Slate This finished the first special venire and when the new one was lined up for examination for statutory qualifications qualifi-cations four of Its members were excused ex-cused Among these were J D Thompson Thomp-son a slock broker and J C Swaner 3 florist both of whom explained to the court tlmtlt was necessary they should he attending to business Of those examined the following were excused for cause by the defense J L Barrow James J lair William White Thomas V White Hezekiah Mitchell and Joseph M Stoutt I Only In the case of Barrow did the District Attorney resist these chal lenges There was 0 slight tilt be I tween Judge Powers and Mr Elchnor when the former subjected Barrow to a crossexamination after Attorney At-torney Straup also for the de fense had about decided to accept ac-cept him Mitchell who was also re jected by Judge Powers because ofa decided opinion which he said ho could not lay 1 aside was also n Juror in the Mills murder case The attorneys on both sides expect to complete the jury today |