Show THE VOTE FOR SUTHERLAND Official Count Reduces It but He is S Still Ahead The of the official j progress canvass I of the election returns In the various counties of the State Indicate that the majority of 170 for George Sutherland based upon the unofficial count was excessive An unaccountable discrep anyhas developed In the Congressional vote Nine counties report a loss of 37C one reports a gain of 41 and one a gain of G4 for the Republican candidate candi-date making a net loss for Mr Sutherland Suther-land of 271 from his first reported majority ma-jority The greatest loss is In Juab county which gives Mr Sutherland 1412 and Mr King 1000 a majority of I 4S8 for King This Is a loss of 198 for I Sutherland In Ulntah county Mr Sutherland gains Cl by the officIal I count the vote being 756 for Sutherland to C29 for King Unless the vote from i I Sanpete county which was also based j upon estimates should show a proportionate propor-tionate loss It Is hardly I probable that the remaining wjorlty of 199 will be 1 overcome but it now seems certain that the contest is to be closer than was at first expected The greatest surprise comes from Utah county where confident claims had been made that Mr Sutherlands majority would exceed ex-ceed 250 The ofllclal count shows It to be l only 139 which Is 73 less than the majority for the Presidential Electors The result in Utah county presented nearly as wide a variation as did that in Salt Lake The highest Republican majority was for Chipman for County Commissioner S7S and lie highest and only Democratic majority was for Storrs for Sheriff he being I elected to his third term by a majority of 1C2 The vote for electors was an follows Walton 5GOS Loose 5698 I Murdock GGOS Powers 5391 Tarbet 53S4 Thoreson 5390 Wells jG7S Moylc I D3SO Sutherland 5C15 I King G47C Dixon DIx-on 5910 Lund 129 Dixons majority is 817 and insures his election beyond a doubt All the Republican members for the Legislature were elected The official canvass in Rich county gives tho following totals For Electors Walton C8S Loose 282 Murdock 3S7 I Powers 2K Tarbet 282 Thoresen 287 Sutherland 360 King 303 Wcjls 582 Moyle 288 Ellison 080 Barnes 231 This ount shows a loss of 20 ° voles for Sutherland Suth-erland from the unofficial returns The ofilclal returns from Piute county arc as follows Electors Walton 327 Loose 329 Murdock 329 Powers 279 Tarbet 277 Thoresen 274 Sutherland aol King 281 Another loss oC 29 from the unofficial returns Is I shown for Sutherland Sutherlands majority in Beaver county IK 1 30 as previously given In Carbon county It Is 99 a loss of 5 while in Emery county It Is 175 a gain of 11 over the figuroa as first reported Carbon countys official returns give Sutherland King 635 Emery coun ty gives Sutherland C61 King 798 In Box Elder county the official count gives Sutherland IMO and King 1491 Sutherlands majority Is lOG a loss of 4 I from the unofficial returns In Soviet county the vole wits 1JS8 for Sutherland to 11J8 for King Thin is a majority of 290 an previously reported re-ported |