OCR Text |
Show THE BOWMAN CASE. f The Court Having; no Jurisdiction : . im It to the Lawyer. j jfl The county court adjourned the BowmdV ease yesterday until Monday at which timfl Attorney Walter Murphy who is a v M curious VOline- man wants to ask U.r Ml Harry Haynes some further question rl garding the forging of his name on M Bowman s bond to the city and t y )' Salt Lake. N The witnesses examined yesterday werBf: Messrs. Stanton and Hall who were ivealli J, and Attorney Walter Murphy's rvs, ui I being to establish the clironollgocal order If event on the presentation of the first, Mr,-rejected Mr,-rejected bond, which has so mysturiouifWy disappeared and the second bond with tllie forged signatures. 1 1 "My impression is," said Mr. MurphlK, " that the bond was type-written and .-evei m.l signatures of sureties were on it. TlBie grounds I now recollect upon which I oBb, jected tn the bund, at least oife, was tl.Mit some of the sureties had signed as corporMa-tions corporMa-tions or linns, the signature having he An. made by one person as the firm. There M have been some defect in the condiiioili I recollect very clearly that Scptumh.-gW gd was a Saturday and that Bowman, Hall Slid myself walked from here to Hull's otlice IB'T, thepurposeofdrawi.ig.il) Bowman's huMnd' ' in pursuance with tho contract. The hojBnd was approved by the county court on dRbe night of September . Hull, Bowman aHud I talked at Hall's office of the form of fltlie bond and agreed upon it, and I left HownHiuu and Hall together." U It was finally decided that the court ciKuM do nothing in the matter, so it was lcttlfor the lawyer to consider what is he-; :.. B do, and report back their advisement to the court. II |