Show GETS VERDICT AGAINST I I AllEGED LOAN SHARK HARK i Judgment Given H F P Rugg in Case Against Union Credit In Investment Investment Investment vestment Company Because a garnishment levied against him was not removed even after It was known that he was not the man against a claim of 50 SO was held H F Rugg yesterday esterday won a Judgment of from the Union Credit Invest Investment ment company of which D H Tolman is the moving spirit It is one of the loan shark cases and has at attracted attracted attracted much Interest The Judgment was entered yesterday after a verdict for that amount was rendered by a Jury in Judge M L division of the district court The first intimation Rugg had that he owed money was when the paymaster of ot the Rio Grande Railroad company here hen told him that his wages had been as assigned assigned assigned signed and he was discharged by the company until the matter was settled Rugg immediately went to the office of the loan agency where he found that thata a man giving the name of H F Rugg had borrowed 50 on April 10 1906 Rugg wrote his name to show that he was not the same man and charged forgery against the man who received the money Soon after this the salary was re released released released leased by the loan agency but It refused to dismiss the garnishment and Rugg could not regain re ain aln his position po with the com company company pany Jany for several months Finally he brought suit against the agency for 1 The Jury jur which returned a ver verdict verdict verdict dict yesterday fixed Ruggs actual dam damages damages damages ages at and the exemplary dam damages damageS damages ages at SW SOO George H II was foreman of the Jury jUl |