Show DEMURRER DEMURRERS IS L Suits of Joseph J E came Gaine q e and ad Max M Junghandel ndel Against Ag t Prank Fn Ha Hagenbarth H Hage ge barth Thrown Tho Out Ou of Court Cou Judge Ritchie yesterday sustained demurrers to two complaints involving Joseph E Caine Calne and Ma Max Junghandel l are the tle plaintiffs and F FJ FJ J Hagenbarth is 1 t th defendant an and winner Inner in both bot instances The first suit was vas wa brought June Jmie 28 23 1907 1901 and asked for It was al that on Jan IT plain plaintiffs plaintiffs I tiffs entered into an anare agreement agrem ment nt wit with the LudwIg Copper Mining company compan whereby In consideration of the pay payment pa ment mont of pf and the further payment of ot within eight months ex th the company would deed to plaintiffs it Its property Jn In n the te Mason district Nevada The money was to be paid in four fou equal installments instalment On Feb F b 7 it I was alleged Caine an and Junghandel entered into an agreement with wih Hagenbarth H ag to sell sel their option opton for and according to tho the con contract tract which was WM drawn was wa paid pid down dows by Hagenbarth the remain der tobe t to bp be pad ld In installments instalments an and each acl payment to be due when the In Installment due the LUdwig company be became became became came payable payable according to the option opton contract held by the plaintiffs Hagen Hagenbarth barth also kiso agreed to pay th the Ludwig company compan the amount which th the plaintiffs It i had made a to pay The amount asked for in this first firs suit were the payments due from Ha Ua Hagenbarth on March Marh 17 and May 17 amounting to On Sept 18 an another another another other suit was brought asking for th the installments Instalments duo July 17 and Sept 17 amounting to The demurrer was argued four weeks week ago and the grounds ground advanced by th the defendant were w re that the complaint did not state a cause of action acton and that i iwas It was ambiguous and unintelligible as i I It did not set forth In ip il detail d tul tail ahe he agree agee agreement ment entered into between the plain plaintiffs plaintiffs tiffs and the Ludwig company |