OCR Text |
Show NOTICE TO PARTIES AND AT-' T0RNEYS. As Judgo Emereou is expected to be with and assist me during the month of October, the call for trial j of the criminal calf ndar in the Third j district court will commence ou the lot of October, und the call of the civil calendar fur trial will commence od Friday, the 28. h ol September, 1877. On the civil calendar eight cases per day will be on call for trial, in the following order, to wit: M. SCHAEFFER, Judge. 101 Brigham Young vs. J- F-. Tyler; Williams & Young aud Sheeki; Strickland fc Hofiuian. 102 Wm. Deuser et al. vs. The IriaM. Co.; Dilly &. Curmester; Marshall Mar-shall & Royle. 103 Mary J. Alexanler vs. Monroe Mon-roe Salisbury; Baskin & DeWulfe; Hempstead ifc Gamble. 104 Brigham Young va. Louis J Reggel;Willian.s & Youug and Sheeks G. R. Maxwell. 105 George C. Bates vs. Willaam 0. Dame; in person; no attorney. 106 R. P. Putnam vs. George F. Sibley et al.; W. C. Hall; Hempstead & Gamble. 107Vm. S. Clays vs. W. Nelson; Robertson &. McBride; Baskin & De-, De-, vVoife. 108 James MuKuigbt vs. Jamea Turnbow; S. il. Lewis; A. Miner. 109 A. Klopeustein et al. vs. H. M. May et al.; Frank Hoffman; Lew ib Burnei. 110 Robert L. Jewett vs. James Lawrence et al.; Tilford & Hagan; Baskin & DeWolle. 1 111 Henry Wadsworth, trustee, ve. R. C. Chambers; Marshall fc Royle; Hempstead i Gamble. 112 E. W. Thompson vs. J. O. Little; Hoge & JonaBson; Woods & Gee. 113 John Grain vs. Charles Crow; Robertson & McBride; A. Miner. . 114 Frank Crocker vs. John Kerr et al.; Woods Gee; Hempstead & 1 Gamble. 115-Excelsior M'f'g Co. vb. J. N. Barker et al.; E. P. Johnson; A, S. Patterson. 116 Samuel S. Walker et al. vs. ' Chas. Popper et al.; Baakin & De-Wolfe. De-Wolfe. Marshall & Royle. 1 117 W. H. Greenhow vs. Flagstaf 6. M. Co.; Bennett & Harkuesa; 3 Robertson fe McBride. 3 118-A. S. Patrick vb. FlagBtaff S 1 M. Co.; Bennett & HarknesB; Rob ertson & McBride. 119 Matbew T. Patrick vs. Flag-staB Flag-staB S. M. Co.; Bennett & Harkness; Robertson & McBride. 120 Thomas Shelton vs. John Paxton; Robertson & McBride; Til furd & Hagan. 121 Robert C. Chambers vs. Wm. R. Carver; Hempstead &. Gamble; Gilchrist & Kaighn. 122 E. Gorlinski va. J. J. Green-wald; Green-wald; Lewis Burnes; Bennett , & Harkness. 123 Ruth E. Kinsey vs. Missouri Valley Life Ins. Co.; Dilly & Bur-m Bur-m eater, Beuuett & HarkoeBs; Lewis Burnes. 124 Heber Clark vs. H. Gardner; Patterson, Bennett & Harkneaa; Stout. Baskin fe DeWolfe. 125 Alexauder Toponce vs. Wm. M. Johns; Robertson & , McBride; Bennett & Harkness. 126 Waldm L. Hatkin et al.; va. Emma Hill Coneolidaied M. Co.; 0. P. Huey; Bennett &, Harkness. 127 Ferdnan Deickert vs. H.Wagner H.Wag-ner et al; Geo. R. Maxwell; Baakin fc De Wolfe. 128 Wells, Fargo & Co. vi. H. C. SburtlefT; Marshall & Royle; Robert-bon Robert-bon k McBride. 129 J. M, Bernheiael va. Mineral Fork S. M. Co.; W. O. Hall; Roa-borough Roa-borough &. Merritt. 130 David llillhouse vs. Horraoe Bliss; WillUinid & Young; Baskin & DeW'olfe. 131 E. P. Jc.buhon vs. Isaac S. Wa terman; Roburisnu & McBride; Ros-borougn Ros-borougn & Merrill. 1314-B. Meredith va. Wm. Cot-ham; Cot-ham; Chas. P. Huey; Dilly &, BurmeB-ter. BurmeB-ter. 132 Andrew Link va. Matilda Norberg; Dilly & Burmester; Woods & Gee. 133 Chicago S. M. Co. vs. J. M. Watson et al.; Gilchrist &, Kaighn; Til lord & Hagau. 134 A. G. Hunter vs. Alex.Tarbet etal.;Robertson fc McBride; in person. 135 Wm. C. Miller vs. Samuel E. Underbill; Tilford & Hagan; Woods & Gee. 136 Chicago Silver M. Co. 78. J. M. Watson ol al. ; Gilohrist & Kaighn; i Tilford & Hagan. 1 .137 Chicago Silver M. Co ve. J. M. Watson et al.; Gilchrist & Kaighn; Tilford & Hagan. 1S.S Salt Lake City vs. Moroni Ed-I Ed-I wards; J. L. Rawlins; Woods fc Gee. : 139 Wilfred Campken vs. Central Pacific R. R. Co.; Geo. J. Marsh; Thomas Marshall. 140 R. C. Thompson vb. FlagBtafi S. M. Co.: Bennett & Harkness; Robertson & McBride. 141 First National Bank, Ornaba vs. Flagstaff Silver M. Co.; Bennett & HarknesB; Robertson & McBride. 142 LouiB Boukofsky & Bro. vs. Mitchell & Sprague; Hoge and Jonas-son; Jonas-son; Woods & Gee. 143 Rein hard Winkler vs. Jacob Moritz and Swen Johnson; Dilly & Burmester; Hoge & Jonassoo. 144 Chicago Silver Mining Co. vs. J. M. Watson et al.; Gilchrist fc Kaighn; Tilford & Hagan. 145 Abe Blunienthal vs. J. J. Greenwald; no attorneys; no attorneys. attor-neys. 146 Twrrilury of Utah, Salt Lake Co., etc , vs. O. F. Strickland; Z. Snow; WoodB A Gee. 147 Dena Johnson v H. N. Ciarson; no attorneys; Hoge & Jooaa son. 148 John C. Graham, assessor and collector, vs. A bra m Taylor; no attorneys; attor-neys; Dilley & Burmester. 149 Salt Lake City vs. James Robbina; J. L. Rwlins; no attor-1 neve. 150 Salt Lake City va. Joseph I Russell; J. L. Rawlins; no attorneys. |