OCR Text |
Show COURT PROCEEDINGS. 1 Supreme Court, McKean, C. J., ' Emerson, A. J. and Uoreman, A. J., on the bench. j JANTJAKY TERM KOL'ATKENTH DAY. j Saturday, Jan. 30th, 1875. Court convened at 10 o'clock a.m. Decisions were rendered in tho following fol-lowing suits, argued during the term: Herman Cramer, respondent, vs. Union Pa-jific Railroad company, appellants; ap-pellants; appeal from tho Third district dis-trict court. Judgment of the lower court reversed, and causo remauded for further proceedings. Opiniou by Boreman, A. J., tho other juhticts concurring, 8. W. Aloore, appellant, w. H. Richards, et. al., respondents; appeal from the Third district court. Judgment Judg-ment of the lower court affirmed. Opinion by Boreman, A. J., the other justices concurring. W. D. Foster vs. Frederick. Reich; 1 appeal from the Third diatriot court, i Judgment of the lower court in refus- ingan appeal, affirmed. Opinion by , Boreman, A. J., the other justices concurrine. ' O. F. Strickland, respondent, vs. Flagstaff 8. M. company, appellants, and O. F. Strickland, appellant, tw. FlagstafTS. M. company, respondent; appeal from the Third district court. Judgments of tho lower court reversed, appeals dismissed and causes remanded re-manded to tbe district court for further fur-ther proceedings. Opinion by Emerson, Emer-son, A. J., Boreman, A. J., concur-ing. concur-ing. McKean, C. J., reserved the right to file a written opinion in the case. R. J. Golding, administrator for the estate of B. Leonard, deceased, respondent, re-spondent, us. Wm. JenningB, appellant; appel-lant; appeal from the Third district court. Judgment of the lower court 1 reversed. Opinion of Emerson, A. J., Boreman, A. J., concurring. ' McKean, C. J., road a contrary opinion. H. J. raust, appellant, vs. Albiua . Williams ei at., responduts; appeal from the Third district court. Appeal Ap-peal dismissed and cause remanded to the lower court for further proceedings. pro-ceedings. Opinion by Emerson, A. J,, the other justices concurring. John B. Milner, respondent, vs. Edward Friel, appellant; appeal from the First district court. Judgment Judg-ment of the lower court reversed and cause remanded. Opinion by Bora man, A. J., the other justices concurring. con-curring. Kclipse Steam Manufacturing Co., appellants, vs. J.R. jN'ichoIs et al., respondents; re-spondents; appeal from the Third district dis-trict court. Judgment of the lower court reversed and causo remanded to the district court, tvith instructions to revoko tho order sustaining tho demurrer de-murrer and to overrule the demurrer. de-murrer. Opiniou by Boreman, A.J., the other justices concurring. Samuel Sraiih, et. al., respondents, vs. J. M. Richardson, et al., appellants; appel-lants; appeal from the Third district court; judgment of tho lower court refusing a now trial was reversed and causo remanded back. Opinion by Emerson, A. J., tho other justices concurring. Kz parte Susan Ann Dixon, on habeas corpus from the custody of the justice's court. The petitioner was discharged, the judgment of the court being that the execution on which she was held boinf void, and that the constable had no right to serve the process or arrest outside ot the county. Opinion by Emerson, A.J., the other justices concurring. Lewis Burnes, appellant, vs. John Craine, respondent; appeal from tho Third district court, judgment of the lower court reversed. Opinion by Emerspn, A.J., the other justices concurring. Greenfield & Strauss, respondents, vs. H. Wallace, appellant; appeal from the Third district court. Judgment Judg-ment of tho lower court affirmed. Opinion by Boreman, A. J., the other justices concurring. White & Allen, respondents, vs. Frank Seely, appellant; appeal from Third district court. Appeal dismissed. dis-missed. Opinion by Boreman, A. J., the other justices concurring. Wines & Kimball vs. Stevens & Shurtliff; appeal from the Third district dis-trict court; motion to dismiss the appeal ap-peal denied. Opinion by Boreman, A. J., Emerson, A. J. concurring, McKean, C. J., not sitting. Court adjourned till 4: o'clock p. m, on Monday, when action is to bo taken on the rules recently presented for adoption by the supreme court. |