Show i StNSAIN INDUNT CASt CHARGES MADEjAGAZKrST1 A JUROR JU-ROR BY DURRA3TT SR I Alleges That JurorSmyth Had Made Up His Mind As to Durrants Guilt Before the Trial Ended San Francisco Dec 24The long promised sensation in the Durrant case developed iateHhis afternoon when W A Durrant father of the murderer presented an affidavit to Superior Judge Seawell in which he charges Juror Smyth with having knowingly used certain information not presented at the trial of Theodore Durrant in deciding the merits of the case in his Smyths mind Durrant sr charges that Smyth talked of the case to reputable re-putable persons before the trial ws concluded that Juror Smyth told these persons that Theodore Durant I had been on terms of criminal intimacy with near relatives and that he was I abnormally developed sexually that Juror Smyth had intimated that Dur I rant sr knew ttgr these relations that I Smyth had made up his mind a to the half defendants concluded guilt Ajat before the trial was 1 r ntst nsrneysife day J formulated I papers on a motion for a writ of probable prob-able cause and presented them to Judge Bahrs but he denied the motion I and gave notice that an application for I a writ of probable cause should he made before the supreme court This will be done ina few days the attorneys f at-torneys for Durrant say |