Show PROOFS PRODUCED Fair Heirs Hovrcver Hint of Forgeries For-geries SAN FRANCISCO June 2iMrs Nettle R Craven has produced the deeds tfnat were recorded with so much myster a few days ago The presentation I presen-tation of those documents before I Judge Slack last night has led to another I an-other startling development in the sensational sen-sational case The attorneys for the I heirs not only claim that the papers I bear their own evidence of forgery but they assert tat unden the laws of California the transfer of property whether made b James G Fair or not is void While Mrs Craven was I too ill to so on the witness stand last I night and was excused until next I Thursday morning the lawyers arrayed I ar-rayed in opposition to her were given an opportunit to Inspect the documents I docu-ments she prizes so highly i Although this Inspection was little j more tan a casual one the attorneys fo the children of Fair claim they t have found new reason to reiterate I their charge of forgery They assert that in one o the deeds the signature i of James G Fair was written over an i erasure which may show something 11 i I more under a microscope I Is also I claimed that the date September 8 i 1S94 was also written over an erasure l I f but independent of these alleged con I slderationa the attorneys for the I children insist that both deeds are void becausethey giveno legal description des-cription be transferred of the property that was to II |