| Show S j I Bi it li p I J f ars Several f lass fSt t i j i < W t fn ii T ASIDE t f t < t l t Ii ri Gf Oh THZKIG CAL 1C < il S t XJ tAN I i < 1 > i 1 4l1 i J < lfp 1 1 I fl1I II t i I t E T o Or Mstl Unhithed for Contempt of i it t Lochrlc 8 Deelsio 1 t t f It N > = J1the3ingei WiirizeiSuitJP J B iillcr OhrIstIanien jW XeleeI 1TJieirJt Own ltecog a5 Wi Mii l inc lIaiterll 5 9 < i tjf wLc iadabiif6ae Judge chiiin ti n foricbneWtrial In the CO5f3OfJOFCpl1IO1t VS g fj B P arson ss TJiC i tIthii wasr tried before 5 Judge 5 BailLthanda uury in April last when averdicta endereff for the plain Wffifl Jth SJlfn Zqt l03i41tlt was jipbn Uu1 i 111211111g that the defendant now y H vl hrpugli His attorney Colonel 1If1 lf t KaighnAttorney Winters ap percd opposltipuv Suii was originally brought to > reF re-F i21875 interest itherepS from r1ei < lst 1891 and costs alleged to be Sue as the > nut balance ot money paid byf ptaitrtlff and other persons to de < feidantyfor he procuring of deeds to certain ands In Bountiful addition townsita plat It was claimed that 138750 was Lid to Pearson in ex Ii 1 19 of < the amount required for the deedsthaihe had refunded the sum gfySlSSre I eaving ulluYaiW the balance suediforvThe plain tiffs case was that 4hiMay l89l thedefendamf represented iaraihYtnHafid l others that lie was the J i n l i fof jtue < probwte JUdge of Davis oot1tRYUt ah for the colleotlbri ot fees mid expfinses for procudn deeds to iI < ls jithe > additional plat above J ili tihe cost for these per ofiand m k1ng survey ryas 42 ReJy Sng upqii these sbatemerifcs plain tiff paid to hlm 168 und the other persons their proportion It was stated however on tjietnialT that the full charge made shtjuld not have exceeded l 5 per lot as reauired lY th Jaws of Utah Upon Up-on demand being made of defendant iftiatarcli 1892 for the return of the amounts toeing piaYd in excessrof the 5he refused fo yield ibjit confessing the incorrectness or his representations in the same year returned 450 per lot ot the Bum unjustly collected anroUnit ing in ithe aggregate to 16875 Jeaving the net balance named as sued for the other parties interested haying assigned as-signed their respective amounts to paint1ff The motion for a new tala was baaed on several grounds among them alleged al-leged irregularity in the proceedings of the court and abuse of its discre Lion by which the defendant was prel vented from having1 a fair trial excessive ex-cessive damages appearing to have I been awarded under the Influence of ipassion or prejudice insufficient testi jnony to justify itheGverdjct and errors of law Upon the conclusion of the arguments argu-ments the case was submitted to the court 1 Decree Set Aside The arguments were made on the motion of the defendant to set aside a decree of divorce the suit of FredA Fred-A King vs Jennie M King the details de-tails of which havEbeen already published pub-lished in The Herald Judge Powers arid Attorney Straup appeared for Mrs King the petitioner and Attorneys Dey Street were for Mr King After hearing the arguments and the testimony his honor granted the motion mo-tion as prayed for and set Jan 4 1895 for the rehearing of the case Taken UDder AdIselUent In the case of Alexander ogers vs John W Donnellan argiunents on motion mo-tion for a new tjial were made by Judge Howat for tire plaintiff and Attorney At-torney Frank Pierce for the defendant I and his honor tookit under advisement advise-ment Must Pay Up Hearing on an order to show cause why John T Snelson should not be punished for contempt of court was had before Judge Bartch John T Snelson is the plaintiff in a divorce suit in which Lizzie Snelspn is the defendant The plaintiff was ortIered by the court to pay his wife 25 a month alimony but ailed to do so hence the alleged contempt Attorneys I Rogers Goodwin and Van Pelt appeared appear-ed for Mrs Snelson and Attorney J A Williams for Mr Snelson Judge Bartch ordered the defendant to pay the back alimony amounting to about 75 within 10 days therlIVise that he be committed for contempt Pleaded Xot Guilty Charles R Whitehead was arraigned before Judge Bartch yesterday on the oharge of petit larceny He entered a plea of not guilty and had his bond reduced to 5250 which he gave before United States Commissioner Greenman TheMangel AVurtzcl Suit Justice Lochrie yesterday handed down his decision in the suit of the Jersey Farm and Dairy company vs the Salt Lake Grain company in which suit was brought to recover 264 for damages the plaintiffs alleging that they had bought mangel wurtzel seed irom tne aerenaani out ins uaiter ae livered them red top beet seed instead Two acres were sown and the beets were comparatively worthless to them for cattle feeding purposes to their damage in the sum claimed The defendants denied any guarantee His honor held that iShs defendants were liable under an > implied guarantee and assessed the damages at 214 Still They Come Two more writs of mandate and prohibition pro-hibition were yesterday issued by Judge Bartch against the Utah commission on the petitions of John Henry Smith a candidate for election to the office of delegate to the constitutional convention conven-tion from the Third precinct of Salt Lake county and of George R Emery also a candidate for the constitutional convention from the same precinct of Salt Lake county = The writs were issued is-sued returnable December 29 Assistant Court llejiortcr Wanted Chief Justice MerrLtt yesterday appointed ap-pointed Attorney J G Sutherland J A Williams and Samuel McDowell asa as-a committee to receive applications and make examination of candidates for the position of assistant court reporter to fiK the vacancy caused by the death of Mr Falconer Released on Their Own Recognizance J P Thompson In custody on the I charge of grand larceny was released re-leased on his own recognizance upon the motion of Assistant District Attorney Attor-ney Richards Miller Christiansen ini the county jail under the change of adultery was also released on his own recognizance on motion of Assistant District Attorney Attor-ney Richards Judgments Entered I William Gibby vs A J4 White for the plaintinT for > 687 S Nellie M Walls lTeadon Heath for the plaintifffdr < l22o20 IsaacaMi Pitts vs John AoiGroesbeck b a tk G l iiff 16 i t S SsS vs I Si8hffrt Orderc S itT Ji 1Iarchi > Lthiey i dmt r = John BWiardeJl e kal demurrer jto complain passed I I Joseph ddaidvsE Parsons et aIdeniurrertO compTamfc stf hear lpg r Dec tI 21 C i Solomoii Karp enlet al vs the Earls FurniJureaidrGarpetcpmpaTiy hearing onfmotioniJto eiaxcossrs get forDecem ber21i reached J 5 f i General Tiqies rcDeputy larsHal Abet Dyer is confined con-fined fsi om wIth af severecold aA torneyyEimer B Jones and wife 1 ihavefeturnedfrom aUf extended pleasure pleas-ure trip on theicoast n I |
