Show Tho Hoaga or Lordi LONDOi August 1OIn the House of Lords today Salisbury moved a second sec-ond reading of ihe Parnell co umission bill after reviewing thj case at some length he said the gentlemen incriminated incrimi-nated did not srek Ijcal redress blez ing that they distrusted British juries If they thought they cuuld not obtjuu uslize in England tLey could have dUfcdin Ireland bn Ustaad i of adopting that course they reiterated their esiwid tor a committee of tha House I of Commons The government considered consid-ered the House iLcipable of furnishing an impartial tribunal where so much personal aud political feeling was involved in-volved and thouebt it bettr to again resort to inquiry by commission The government had lull confidence that justice would be done as it had nominated nomin-ated three of the ablest and most urn partial judges The charges against ihese judges had not 1 ft the slightest stainon the characters of tbe distinguished distin-guished men against whom they were directed but they had covered with lishonor the ship which impugned them The commission would close these controversies con-troversies It was not well that members of the House of Commons Com-mons should be accused in the most solemn manner of having tampered with the matter The tmth should be known whatever might le the issue The government was convinced it bad done good service in driving rom tOe arena of political discussion tais foul and scandalous controversy Baron Herschell lbsra > i idignantly repudiated Lord Salisburys insluua tions of his Herschella colleagues for having taken in the Commons a course I which holding views they did they were bound to take He maintained that his friends were in no way deserving deserv-ing of censure Ho regretted that the committee of fhe House had not been appointed He strongly protested against the doctrine that if the newspapers bring charges against the public menthe men-the accused person must be guilty it he did no immediately sue for libel If I that doctrine was to be applied it should be applied impartially and proof that it was not so applied was furnished by the fact that two members of the government had gone to support before his constituents a Conservative member against whom allegations had been made and never refuted and respecting re-specting which he had never sued for lioel The speaker defended Parnells course in not suing for libel Even the justice of specifying and defining the charges had been denied Irish members mem-bers and the commission was allowed to range through all tbe vague allegations allega-tions in the series of anonymous newspaper articles such an inquiry was fraught with most dangerous injustice In composing the commission one member at least should have been chosen who was in political sympathy with the accused Salisbury said there were two falicies in Baron Herochem Herschells speech That gentleman assumed what was untro namely that of government had any interest in establishing the guilt of Irish members On the contrary con-trary if it were shown that their political politi-cal party was not connected with the crime the fact would conduce to a restoration res-toration of peace and quietness in Ireland Ire-land Iaron Herschell had also falsely assumed that the government had originated the inquiry de protested Iotlmt the government being treated IS prosecutor The duty it nad endeavored en-deavored to discharge was one to select i tribunal of the highest perfect impar iali y He believed the government I iud fcuoCBijfully discharged that duty |