Show COURT MATTERS jppealed Cases ArguedAfter i SlopingWi n 8 s 7 Following is the business transacted in Judge Zanes court yesterday Anew trial was allowed in the case of Frederick Growton vs John L Lynch Morris Dusseldorf et al vs Ontari Silver Mining Company demurrer ar gned and submitted Fremont National Bank vs George Beck motion Of > defendant to discharge ttachment nrguea and submitted Joan j Wise and Frederick U Alsop were admitted to citizenhip Mr WblttemQre areued the case or the people vs Mrs L Midaen appealed from the Justice Cour He contended that tuecae ought to be dismissed because be-cause it had been Set down for trial and never called the term having elapsed before it was reached He was answered an-swered by Messrs Richards and Moyle andthe Judge then overruled the motion saying that as the defendant baa taken an appeal she had acquiesced in the delay and cotil i Have hal a trial if sim had desired to puih it Messrs Richards and Aloyle also appeared ap-peared to argue two ohr appealed cases thosef the People vs Ht bcr West for creating a disturbance aud M McLaughliu ior selling liquor without with-out a license Mr Barlow Ferguson represented the defendants and claim o that the cases should be d suussed 01 the ground that the ofFa = ea were indictable in-dictable that the justice had no jurisdiction I juris-diction and that the statute gave defendants de-fendants the right of a trial byjury Mr Moyle drew attention to tbe fdct that unless a jury trial were demanded the jury should be neld as waived be also claimed that it had been held by Judge Borenian in the Sprague habeas corpus that the justice had j risdictiou where small penalties had be imposed as in these cases Mr Ferguson mentioned I men-tioned the YeanaT Spiers decision and Mr Moyle replied that that had been dismissed solely because the penalty was 300 fine and six month s imprison meat Judge Zane reserved his decision Daring the afternoon the grand j jury filed into court and asked that an attachment at-tachment or bench warrant be laSued for J S Reeder and Mrs J S Reeder defaulting witnesses The case in which they were wanted to testify was not named U e rumor had it that they are witnesses in the Hawthorne polyglmyfcase and another states that the Grand Jury id investigating houses of illfame and assignation and that the Reeders3nnection with the somewhat some-what odorous City Hotel is what brings them up at the present time I |