Show lA iE 1 r MADE IN CASE CASEau K Comity au and aid Murray l h That mat No Further 15 to Company's 1 1 Shall Be Filed county Salt I. I Lake ke and the theby they by their tt attorneys atOY rn yesa yes yes- y with th the stipulation ed a p. p company b by ht Traction bt fc county and aid city as corpora- corpora from films w n-n-w h any fur- fur In in tests or i 1 EJ EJU J the application of or the thet with U company DY for an Traction t f k rates to 8 S scents cents an Ln addit addi- addi In- In and an t for tor transfer in the tho pu pub public c pupils for tei previous pre 5 5 cents or a In rates from 6 or o on n increase or additional for trans trans- mu J 1 cent cents f.-Cen f fare tue t for r school children to bo bo be considered as asi i stipulation makes the record and no of ot ot of cases as 38 bearing hearing ezrIng or protest by tho the pared pared pared par par- be filed or further ed ed can asked citizens prevent not no however corporations or firms duls s or testing either individually or oror eli j or from rom that tests testa be heard beard Tho Tim eh Ich was filed flied with the public commission yesterday In c sub sub- uh- uh as follows t Tend Tena of Stipulation on thereby hereby stipulated by and behe be- be beho beho ho he Utah Light Traction com com- d 4 counsel for tho the various pro pro- that the tho commission by and ej con consent nt of the company as the protestants shan shall forthwith of ot the Is- Is to tt Its Its- consideration ed d both b by the petition as well petition filed to- to arrive at Its conclusion con lusion and nation nation- of the tho issues raised by d p petitions without the calling t further hearing or the tho taking farther further additional testimony is dated April 30 and Utah Ugh Light t Sc Trac- Trac by bT the L panT by H. H F. F i l ce oy CY jonn onn I Ie tane e C itt attorney for tor the company 1 H. H Folland city attorney for tor fore Eke e Richard Hartley county ator at- at tor feor or Salt Lake county John E B. iy attorney for tor Murray and md andton ton lion Walton attorneys for E E. ton ion l c 2 Statement tai by Company j a a. st statement showing rage rag number of or of or the they jy 7 y the total number of ot hours by them during the year also J le e. e of wages wag for each class and andt of t workers as 33 of April 30 30 1920 of of f May 1 1 1920 The Tho number t t. year rear men men Is ls given at 56 56 see sec ar m men n 63 68 and thereafter men 4 1 a total toW of The hours hourn of or ofa a Ii 1919 1819 for tor first year men arc are arcis is second year men d d. d thereafter a 3 total of 5 hours bours The present scale new no It amount of or Increase follow fonow ur ear eai 39 57 7 bear ar 43 W 6 i fter ter r 47 C Ct t lf Two wO 0 Increase es MM M bS In Lu fare have ha been granted ah Light Traction com company pany August 1 1 1917 when it ita a application for an increase in by the abolition of of fifty commutation tickets ticket rand nd d Imposing 1 cent for trans trans- application was granted Ina In- In a abolishing the cent 4 ticket commission refused the addi- addi cent 1 c nt transfer asked The orha ore ore or- or ha e e commission which was wag Issued e r J 2 1917 reads In part a as fl the present revenues from the operation of the tho not sufficient to adequately te the tho company it la Is there there- aTe er eted 1 that the sale of cent 4 Ration on tickets be bo discontinued tetter et er charge o of 01 1 cent bein being ing de- de application for further r Inin in- in in b rat rates the Utah Light Trac- Trac ny on May 21 21 1918 and Ith the commission on that company sot Set forth the tho facts S e stated staled and then adds This Thib on FolI Pure o. o STIPULATION MADE IN TRACTION CASE Continued From Preceding Page order Is not upon values shown or rates of oC return but on account of increase in- in crease In wages of ot the increase ln- ln crease cr aggregating annually and that it was estimated the discontinuance discon discon- of oC cent J tickets would amount mount to to offset tho thoIn Increase In In wn wages es Effect of ot Wage Increase Subsequent to tho the decision continues con- con the tho company compan demand was m made do by the for tor an Increase In In wages wages wages' which amounted to per year Tho The company refused tho the demand and arbitration followed with wilh J J. F. F Merrill P. P P P. P Christensen and E E. B B. B CrItchlow as na arbitrators They awarded an increase In excess of ot To meet this the tho company compan proposes to effect a saving saIng b by operating Its cars except In congested districts with a I. I single lo operator which would save from Crom which should be deducted as bonus wage wago for compensation of at additional labor leavInG leaving leav leav- caving ing tho the not saving Providing for tor limited transfers and Imposing a charge of ot 1 cont cent which would amount to but as ns transfers tr would be bo decreased approximately approximately 20 per cent cont tho ho net Increase I would be bo the two increased revenues aggregating On this application tho the commission granted Gr an Increase of ot faro Iro to 6 cents and cent 5 5 commutation tickets denIng denying denying deny den ing tho tho application for tor operator one-operator cars or 1 cent for tor transfer These rates have ha remained In effect to the present Recently hearing was waa had on tho application of tho the traction company for an increase of or fare tare to 7 cents 1 cent additional for transfer and 5 cents for tor school children This was wao taken under advisement Now comes an nn application by the traction company for an increase of ot faro taro to S 8 cents plus 1 cent for tor transfers transfers trans trans- fers ers 5 cents for tor school children that children that thatIs Is forty fares for or 2 and commutation tickets of or thirteen for 1 The Tho reason for tor this Is stated b by General Mana Manager er DIcko Dicke to bo be that the tho Increase granted tho the men by the arbitrators adds per year car to the operating expense of ot the tho traction system It is tho the two latter applications that officials of ot tho the city and county have consented to have considered as one ono application and which by their stipulation stipulation lation I bars any protest by tho city or county or any further farther hearing upon their part |