Show o tl M TI N N GD r r TREASURY URr C. C Glass Makes 1 mi ry 1 h t c His Objections to poal of Western States Stales I 1 dation for Irrigation I I treasury department of oC the I pe the disapproves j I c bonding feature and nd J cas proposed In association by the Wes west west- 1 Is tes II contaIned In a letter on Conn ot f Charles n. n McNary Ic a tor fo Ll PO Simon n i- i amberger In Secretary Carter enclosed 5 e ica of January 26 G CODI considering ff I committee 1 ke L or of December 31 31 n. HII 1913 c Cie e Ie Sam closed his Iris books for forI the of oC his Indebted Indebted- I out to federal financier ho hoon should Con Oon- on JanuarY l new fields of ot t upon the reduce taxes or will wiIl beI be bc beIt zt it of oC the floating debt tout out of or tho the taxes cs prof pro- pro It t I law and f coming coming- within the general f war pi t l HI ills iliA he again repeats In Inc Her c eito to Senator McNarY Ic chairman Senate Stute i committee on irrigation Lion of or arid lands who re reproduced re- re produced a bill In tire the Sen- Sen advances ances to tire the I and for tor the Issue and dis- dis r bonds In reimbursement th re- re for other purposes II was the outcome of ot thc the eon eon- of the thc executive committee of ot a association lon which was wasi i recently and which t leaded ded b by by Governor Bamberger CoT cor y William Spry William R. R Engineer George F. F Mci Mc- Mc i and Oliver J. J Grimes conference an endeavor was ret jet all tho the measures pertain pertain- i fee thi reclamation of oC lands In the thc e s 's together and see sec if it all could I led In one ODO measure and andin I I I tn in issue of or government so bonds I count of ot 2 to aid in jets the thc mona money derived from i c the bonds to be advanced on onit it and amid a provision pro made to the government gO I Objections Objection i Iro proposition was objected to by a ur department tho opposition lazed It was said upon the I j t I of ot Secretary Glass Januj Janu- Janu er ef Senator Introduced Ji the Senate In accord maccord accord with the theo Lof tf o the conference of or tho the West West- It Reclamation association sent lent to the treasury depart- depart fon on January 26 G Secretary Glass Glas titor acknowledging PI t l and then stated his reasons T rig the bill ler says Ea's I regret to have ha Uc tIe committee that the tho treas- treas disapproves of oC the and nd bonding bonding- J features es of oC the Durd Burden n objection to the tho the he DO t nr nf I i x 1 v. v I ii UL j me ne itS Secretary y Glass s continues lit lt 1 upon the thc treasury treasur S States the thc burden of oC the reclamation projects but butto to g give ge e the appearance of a dIrect V. V the appropriation b- b by authe au- au United 1 of th tho treasury Stales Stes b bonds to lo provide required for tho the t purpose of e your committe s very strong strong- F rr In ia a mo ma determine bin bill i Is 9 meritorious that the plan EC her Iter d Oy by A In appropriation to h handle nd arid and e eOy a direct ot of a 8 specific amount for the thc tho secretary of or the Under the tho general nud nu- nu d freo to conferred on him him by byal by Othe 1 the al finance the tho require require- rk found from time to time Pedal To lo au- au Jle the of ot b bonds rid to rethe re- re for Cor the advances s to On an and Prove provo en cartt car em- f tt t in 19 the v I qt t ti tito United credit rr States and fir financial Jn ial lut r Exemption lice continues the I secretary that the bonds be ott from rota taxes United States States r cond although Liberty t bond ond act and c or the tr treasur U It has been the 11 ry to the t. t tent to t federal deral except to lo a a. vcr very surtaxes and c and I 1 do faIr t to t the not nt feel that it Ubert bonds patriotic to edE confer conCer upon u I of Treat bonds buncis et t been which in thc the t denied Liberty bond bonds 1 th the bill bili V 0 I gO a Without appropriation or of n. n nent from reference to s 5 bonds a. a 0 of r SI L the tho s secretary feel that t the proposal to Ita eXpenditure or of noel would du de- careful t of view vie Consideration r U expenditure or oj economy In |