| Show State Funds Handled in Only Way That ThatIs 1 Is s Possible Under the Laws of Utah J I I T is gt l lt p characteristic of the joint jint campaign for state offices IT I 1 n made b b the thea Democracy and its first aid to the he injured tho a 1 third third term twin p party parts that the o only ly ground upon which which thc they consider is that of or disposition of tho tho state fun funds s thc they p may nav attack Governor Go Spry Sp d. d matter master with which the Governor has bas nothing to do Even if the fert fertIle lo a 1 evolve most dis- dis these could a imaginations of off the Ule orators of e parties tre ing state start of affairs airs and prove them by a most helpful come coincidence that could in that condition no argument to lo be true there would still be apply aga against the true Governor Go As the tlC s state treasurer points out th the conI control con con- I 1 s si or in his bIS hands and whatever praise tint of State state funds is absolutely In I warrant should be directed against him i criticism thc their r handling may wn Nor h is S there anything for which the state treasurer need apologize apolo apolo- f the of which this his official official is is a gize or that needs explanation by bythe party member T The e laws of Utah prescribe no method by which interest maybe may maj different at this a Conditions arc no the slate state be ho collected on moneys mones time than they ht have been the funds of the commonwealth have ha always that for the past four with the exception been heen handled as the they now are years vears they have been more economically administered and that during r this period l for the first time timo in tho the history of the commonwealth Utah has tuns not found it necessary to borro borrow q q money to conduct the or ordinary v iO I business of the 2 Government Much ruch of the th un undeserved and futile criticism of the Governor concerning con con- letter wr written by the Governors Governor's Govern Govern- the slate funds finds is based upon a 1 t or ors or's s 's predecessor a now president of a Salt Lake bank in in which his in institution in- in offers tho the commonwealth interest upon its funds His Iris motive for presenting an all offer which he lie knew could not be accepted is is still t pro problematical for during his own tenure of office he be memorialized both s t sessions of the Le Legislature suggesting a statutory provision by which inI in- in F I st might be collected from the banks which bold hold tho the state funds o No T action however howe was taken but his attitude e certainly indicated his full I recognition of the fact that authority to collect such interest was lack lack- t I ing It is a tribute to the Governor however Jowe and to the party of which he lie is bo so o di tim a member that thal the only ground upon which he is ig isI I attacked i is one oue in ill which the responsibility would not he be his even e if conditions con eon I. I were actually flagrant But inasmuch as there is nothing in in them to criticise the value alne o of this i to lo his opponents is most doubtful indeed J f 1 l j i III professors professor's attitude in ill favor of free Professors Professor's T trade trude is as characteristic of him as is his I opposition to the tho education of the comI common com corn 0 Opinion pInIon 0 of f must do no people eo Ie his be bethe belief lief that somebody mon men p I J t fl il I J J the chilI children chil chil- l the Common the dirty duty work of the world and that People drew dren ren of the working classes should be brought up I jl II I to lo the work their parents are arc now doing r The i t two wo hn basic c ideas are wonderfully harmonious and lly free trade nation in iii the civilized world I eon consistent since ince the only lc really is Great Britain where the the g general rule that tho the son sou of the bricklayer i i i i shall be he a bricklayer and find that his daughter shall go out to service isi is f If if f c. broken braked by only a afew few brilliant exceptions that prove the nile rule The i relation bet between the two tO ideas leas is so intricate and so firmly established J that on one could not l hold d dominance in m the professors professor s mind wit without bout the theother il I other sharing it That an all American of education and one entrusted for so man many I J years with the task o ot stimulating the intellect and training I I I. I the tIe m mentality t of the rising generation should entertain such sentiments I siems ms incredible yet they he arc are Yo vouched for by many of his former stud stu- stu i d t-s t flouts dents an and members co of the Princeton faculty J J. W. W Park swell awell well well- kw n resident of Los Log Ang Angels tc ti who ra raQu uirt t in in the thet eln ln x s of r 18 and was the university fellow in social science during 0 the e year ClI 98 1897 quotes Professor sor Wilson as follows I do not believe e in Democracy the Democracy the rule of the many I believe i. i in aristocracy the aristocracy the rule of the few but I wish an aristocracy of L J. J brains not of wealth I disapprove of the Chautauqua idea the attempt t to give a aj I 1 j smattering of culture to everybody which results in securing conI con con- I without knowledge I t 1 I AM OPPOSED TO THE HIGHER EDUCATION OF THE THEt I t COMMON PEOPLE SOMEBODY MUST DO THE DIRTY WORK VORK OF THE WORLD WHY SHOULDN'T THE CHILDREN CHILDREN CHIL CHIL- 1 DREN OF THE WORKING CLASSES BE BROUGHT UP TO DO DOTHE DOt t THE WORK THEIR PARENTS ARE NOW DOING i Jt It js is scarcely necessary to point out that such ideas as these became t obsolete when hn Abraham Lincoln signed the he Emancipation Proclamation f or that an individual who holds such sentiments is scarcely fit to be bei I i the c chief e executive of oJ a nation the greater greate proportion of whose citizen citi- citi I I. I I. I zen p is IS composed of these same common people In this great l j land of opportunity where ones one's destiny is what bat one makes it and k t. t where individual success is only limited by ones one's own intelligence en- en 1 elgY and amI integrity the exponent of such sentiments is an anachronism ism j I. I v i 1 1 e 1 1 I ff n q t 1 I ag i iF F HE definite announcement by the Governor J t Dubois Not Notto THE of Idaho that he has 11 no intention of ap up- appointing pI p- p 4 I to Succeed d pointing Fred T. T to the senatorial 1 vacancy occasioned by the death of Mr Heyburn Heyburn will be good news lo to the people of the as Senator tain taus states The fear that this would be done however was justifiable because of the friendship between Governor Hawley and Dubois and the prominent part the latter has once more assumed in controlling Demi Democratic Dem Dem- i I politics in the Gem state The important role rol which Dubois j V played as western manager of the c campaign for Speaker t. r Clark loaned hum him a a rather doubtful and tem temporary A ora rY political P res respect respectability P ecta- ecta ai a- a rd i 1 1 r and nd he h has s used usen this to advantage antage in f forcing rc ng h himself once m more re 1 I upon his Ius party in in the state that had fondly imagined it was rid nd of him a. a for good and all t r I Fred T. T Dubois is not senatorial timber despite the fact that Idaho 1 I in an nn unguarded moment once once- sent him to the United States Senate H He I contributed no dignity or efficiency to that body and reflected no honor honorI honorA A I or credit upon his ins state slate It would be he absurdly foolish t to commission him i I t to lo a seat vacated by a statesman of the attainments of f Mr Heyburn Now ow that the Governor Go of Id Idaho bo a close per personal friend friend of Dubois g has II r recognized that there IS is a prInt point beyond which friendship p may not go it i h JK to be he hoped th the good people of Idaho Idabo will see to it that the ne next neIt t Legislature is Republican thus assuring a quietus to the Dubois am nm- i I A 1 d 1 I 0 SMATTER ATTER what hat may be the attitude t of ther the tho r Victory of I NO thou thoughtful voter upon the he tariff tariff qu question st n D Democracy y whether he be hol hold with the Republican p prin principle n n ci le of or ciple protection or the Democratic tariff for Means More I revenue only theory none will dispute that the I Lean Years Year I professor and his party parI will mako make radical radie changes t 1 i I in the present policy of the government Whatever Whatever What What- ever direction these changes m may Y take it is a I c certainty that a new basis will ill be created to which which business must adjust t itself The manufacturer who produces a protected article will decrease I his output or close his factory altogether until he knows whether raw material is to he be cheapened by bv the reduction of the tariff and ond whether ether a j the protection is to be hc removed remo from the article which he be manufactures i I When the factory clos closes s its lose their their means of liv livelihood the merch merchants professional men and bankers in the community lose i 1 I their r sources of income j next Wert on the list come the bread line and the soup houses It is advisable that every e voter oter b before fole he be a goes to the polls t two w o w weeks ks from next Tuesday ponder well this question Prosperity is with us us' is it worth while to change it it'D D the people desire another Cleveland administration I e. e If It the present development in women's sL sty styles es continues all the I 1 dealer in in U gents gents' trousers 99 QU cents a leg leg r will have baye to do do doto to win n big hig trade de will ill be to put a little litHo trimming on the bottom J r 1 |
