Show brorn th jireh it J R lie Is CM art jalcs sn arntal to the coart alia anpo 0 city v J it of lie peace 0 fi 0 by calling libin iti names on I 1 zet saturday foil hiis before jusine marih ifft at 10 a in tam pr called sir harvey carl ie an a nit nea the was dispatched after him on bia arrival hen as shorn a follows ho knew J K BOW him lat saturday in front of alving atones cigar batore bieard a conversa tiomi and kaile out biad a letter lia biad just received from bield about rideout alicio a ayick oll econn drel croch conversation wim not very loisil beard said about a cap fit it wai said be fora lie ether 1 I city rested 0 I 1 ws called for alie defendant ho was on the occasion referred to eaid an old een cania up and banded a letter to who saul come into my office aud ill bhoj you a letter I 1 bae alie old gentleman said no v ent into alio llio eay ing 1 I alio outfit lias tut you up to this the not loud witness waa about ittu feet froin alie door v hen it occurred crass theo balo boen something eaid I 1 did not hear the defence rested then argued the case for alio prosecution ho read alie ordinance relative to di the and the caiaro something biad been aard of a litween hideout and alie abia bavo no weight lias defendant broken the ordinance if BO lie is guilty if not be be d testified to alio traducing language used by defendant watson corroborated it denies it either is mistaken or lias aw urn falsely carlyle to rideout railed an old j mr to corroborate defendant even he beard nothing aboutack abou taca fitting yet lie was but two or three feet an ay against this wo leave only alie uncorroborated evidence of the defendant alie testimony shows belond all reasonable d nut that defendant did an offense offence ioanid io iniD squarely under the statute mr baid defendant v as entitled reasonable doubt yet it was net nert BiAry for bina lo 10 a ail himself of this profusion pro J S U atson did not corroborate but contradicted anin stevena corroborated ro defendants version the conversation was not loud for cral witnesses did not bear it at all it ia not a calnin in ogden to above a whisper I 1 presume that if a man bays will call ino a thieving alj aud atie answer is if alio cap als you ou must wear it that no disturbance of the peace lias o burred garble ia flatly by IIer riman then w the only witness the vile language used alin is a case ought not to have been brought as it does only fraai boino ill in business transactions in bew of case should be considered unworthy of further prosecution anil therefore there foie if he only stid the cap fita you there WAS no ini nn aire and no disturbance of the joaie mr limped that ilia honor would Riv otle defendant alie of every leiBin ablo doubt was guilty of U 0 Hidi iut if a roan boull my you aro a d 1 old i on a crowded public street in alie broad liba of day in the liparini lie arini ot several witness not ini the patty I 1 refrained from commenting oil stev aaa testimony but the captain lias brought it up sevens bieard nothing tx anibe alie was over be fura lie stepped out fron the ofin o to the street it defendant cursed hideout or him lie ia guilty and the court so rind justice Pres liaw that a portion of defendants evidence had been overlooked by both pait es and that was 1 I called him an old liar I 1 li ive DO doubt that lansu ano was used that should not be used by one gentleman to another under any circumstance the judgment of the court is that defendant be fined 10 and costs an appeal was talen and the bonds were placed at floo tho bond to be filed t day As sir rose to go ho said 1 I that I 1 wont be arrested for going out of tho office air heywood alio latter smiled and allowed him to paim |