Show I SENATE TO RECEIVE TARIFF Bill FROM COMMITTEE TODAY VI Flaw in iii Print Paper Provisions Pointed Out in Senator Smoots Smoot's s Analysis July 10 Tomorrow Tomorrow W WASHINGTON V V the Underwood Simmons tariff tt I bill bil will be he r reported to the time Senate b but t tI I the majority report favoring ta the thc measure measure measure meas meas- ure will not be presented by b- Chairman n Simmons Simmon until Monday If Jf Republican leaders do not nol press for more time In which to consider the measure general debate will begin on Monday also This question will be decided at a n. of oC the full tull membership of or the finance committee tomorrow ov morning That the provision of ot the bill Ie levyIng levy levy- lug Ing luga a dut duty of l 12 per cent ad valor valorem m mon on oil print paper valued at more than 2 i b cents a n pound and not more moro than i 4 cents a ROUnd pound may repeal a portion of ot the Canadian reciprocity act of ot 1911 is 15 contended In time the analysis of or the me measure meas meas- of Senator Sen Semi ure nrc prepared d under direction ator tor Republican member of ot tho the finance committee H If it does not op operate op op- crate erate to repeal the Jaw law It is contended that there will bo IJo two rateS in controversy con can N on this tills oC of paper Besides the duty of tiC 1 12 per pei cent Ae ad ami valorem tho the Democratic bill would im impose Im- Im pose u at countervailing tax In hi retaliation for c export port license fee or Ol other charges ii Imposed by UY u a foreign country I An Interesting point to coh consider 81 dOl tho the analysis sots setS forth is l is the tha effect of or the enactment ot- ot this of-this this paragraph para graph on the ho portion of th the Canadian reciprocity act which u admits to lo entry entry- ted from froni t Can Canada nalla n free lec of dut duty duly paper pane r Imported ada alla valued at not lIol more than 4 cents per pound With t respect to printIng print print- t ting t- t Ing paper valued at l more moro than i and not Hot more than thail 1 I cents pe per it Is Is manifest that there thero a repugnance between het tho time two statutes for or by the terms term of or one omme the time act net of oC 1911 It Is free froc of dut duty and b by the time terms o otho of tho tim tariff bill It Is subject to a dut duty of 1 12 per ver cent ad valorem Nor XOI can tho the two statutes be so construed d us S t to stand together Under tuch Juch circumstances circumstances circum circuit stances the rule rulo of oC low law 1 Is that limo tho statute of later date dote must prevail over statute being the latest t the earlier HH nH expression lon of or th the th legislative lei will and anti that t consequently the time carl early statute stands tand repealed IJ by Implication Republican leaders ers will male make a a. point of oC this on the time floor of oC the Senate |