Show c f DIDNT MEAN IT The Xews of last night takes the DEMOCRAT DEMO-CRAT to task for the article whiclfappearedi in Mondays issue entitled Who are the1 corrupt oncs and says Whereat I the organ of the Young Democrats arose in its wrath The News never said they were the ludicrous display of injured innocence which one paragraph para-graph produced in our choleric contemporary to the contrary notwithstanding notwith-standing If the New were asked whom it did mean by its paragraph no doubt it would decline to answer There was but one ticket in the field at the time the paragraph was written and that ticket was the Democratic ticket The Democratic party had been soliciting the suffrages of the people and the News in its i covert cowardly way did not say to whom its referred leaving the public to draw whatsoever conclusion they saw tit The Democrats were seeking to have their I candidates elected to office and could any other inference be drawn from these i remarks of the News A horde of corrupt J I cor-rupt carpetbaggers and hungry office seekers are trying to blind the eyes of i the people to their true interests and secure to themselves the holding of the 1 1I I public pursestrings and the manipulation I of the public funds All the rules of language and its interpretation can give but one construction to the language of the News and that was the construction of the DEMOCRAT But we are glad to know the News never meant whatitsaid Certainly News nor any paper of the Peoples party never went to the trouble to tell who the candidates on the t Peoples ticket were it was sufficient suffi-cient that the men thereon had been set apart to fulfill the duties of legislators If the News wants a nasal story it will find a capital one in Tristram Shandy far superior to the one it relates |