Show A Paralyzer The Harrington nv T Times relates the following For the past ten days the District Court at Cheney has been occu pied in trying the case of Holmes vs the Northern Pacific Railroad Both Company sides were ahfo represented by able counsel and the story comes to us that during an argument for nonsuit a legal that gentleman from Walla Walla remarked the concomitancy of the relation of the evidence relative to the concurrent circumstances produces an ultimatum which inculpates rather than exculpates the complaint The jury had been about half asleep up to the time the above flow of language struck them with the force of an electric shock His Honor gasped once or twice for breath then reached for his pen remarking The Court failed to catch the last sentence please repeat and I will make a memo randum If on looking up authority I find that said remarks mean what I think they do Ill have y ° U fined for contempt of court In the meantime the jury can take an hours recess to recover their faculties If the above be true the Walla Walla lawyer seem to carry the first torch in the lr nssion |