Show N b l lf f h t ts' ts l 6 Jat J- J Y r- r at t I s' s V. V t t. t T r l A REVISIONIST CHALLENGE TO THE TILE US U.S. HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL 1 MUSEUM 1 By Bradley R. R Smith This ad dopes docs s not claim the he Holocaust never nc happened Those hose who hI say 1 it do docs i want to muddy the issue Tim This is what the ad dos does claun The lIC US U.S. Holocaust Memorial t Museum displays no convincing proof whatever of homicidal 1 gassing chambers and no proof that lat even n one individual was lS gassed in a German program of genocide the question then is not Did tic the IC Holocaust aust 1 happen The 1 he question is If there were no gas gis chambers what hai CU the die U Holocaust J This Museum promotes the le charge that the Germans murdered the Jews Jew of ot Europe in in homicidal g gassing chambers It therefore has a mural moral obligation to demonstrate that lat the le charge is true Those ha c who ho contend it is more important to be sensitive than truthful about whether or not the th gas pas chambers existed debase Americas America old civil of free inquiry and andopen andopen open debate and they betray the ideal of the university ity it itself lf For the benefit bandit of whom What are the facts The Museums Museum's proof for a gas chamber at Bir is a plastic model imagined magin d by a Polish artiste A rl plastic plastic copy of a metal door dooris is displayed as of a hon homicidal gas chamber at Mai Maidanek iek k And incredibly the he Museum has simply dropped the the- Auschwitz tz gas chamber the thc h basement room visited i arty vl h b by V hundreds s thousands o of tourists in in J Poland ola ld There lure is no lII mention of the alleged gas chambers at aId ald or even at Dachau hac aller World War II 11 American GIs GL and ci Li i civilians were er a assured that more than victims l' were cre gassed and bum burned d the lh notion that thai eyewitness testimony given under highly and emotional L is s prima pruna facie true hue was as refuted by the Israeli Supreme Court when it acquitted John of being beang Ivan ili the T Terrible The Th I Israeli Court found that eyewitnesses eyewitnesses eye eye- witnesses wino who testified t that operated operated oper oper- gas chambers could not be believed Deborah Lipstadt argues in in her much- much praised Denying the Holocaust that revisionists id J should not be debated because there can not nor be another side to the theIS BIS IS chamber r story stor This is where revisionism displays splays its strength Revisionist h theory ry re resting only on facts acts can be disproved theory Io having fallen into the hands of cultists must be believed Im I'm not in disagreement with Ms Li and her hr clique claque on the gas chamber controversy because cause th they may l b. b iw Zionists or J Jews V C n That's I nu S d disingenuous I Im I'm m in m d' d disagree disagree- I ment Wi with I her over the fact that dial she argues against light of day our coding that in a free society all ideas are arc best illuminated illuminat d din in the light shed by open debate The Museum is tS so confident no on one will challenge its gas chamber that hal it even claims to have found a new death camp gas clumber chamber Proof The uncorroborated aled fantasies of one man pandering to the victims ms of oil I survivor The Museums Museum's historian doesn't a cn c en cn know where the place was It may have been en near Giessen May have been heen That's the best ru writing million can buy When I 1 challenge such u h g gas slumber r I understand Im I'm Im I'm gum going to l I be c slandered as an antl emite by true believers representing the Holocaust Lobby nl These SC quasi reli religious quasi sous Holocaust zealots claim that b because of the purity of their own feelings about the he Jewish experience during World War Two mine mine mini murf be soiled when h I express doubt in rib what they preach as truth Yet YeI not even Winston Churchill in his six- six volume history of World War Two or I Dwight ight D D. Eisenhower in his memoirs made reference to homicidal gassing charn chambers rs How Ilow do 00 the l Holocaust Lobby and its Mu Museum explain that Intellectuals who do not believe that intellectual freedom is worth the lt while on this thus historical 1 issue issue should ask themselves cs why hy they believe its it's worth the while on an any historical issue Then n they should explain their answer to 10 the r rest 1 of orns us The Operation and Technique of the Museum The Museums Museum's exhibit technique t is a m mixture tun of sinister suggestion and dishonest omission Example the first display play confronting visitors beginning the Museum tour is s a wall-sized wall photograph of American soldiers soldier looking at corpses smoldering on a pyre The context in which you see the photo suggests that the dead pictured in it h are murdered Jews Were the prisoners killed or did they die of typhus or some other disease during the last terrible weeks of the war war Autopsies made by Allied medical personnel found inmates died rd Not one was wa found to have nave been cn gassed All such relevant information is omitted from this exhibit We W dont don't even know that the dead pictured in the photograph arc are Jews I Unable table to judge judg the th significance of the photograph and not wanting ng to Believe the Museum would mislead you you arc are moved to accept the false and manipulative vc suggestion that it somehow rl represents the lie genocide of the Euro European an Jews Call the Museum Find Out For Yourself Im I'm willing to hi he l 1 e convinced Im I'm wrong ong about the lh gas chambers chambeno Authentic phy physical al remains or wartime wartime-g wartime generated documents ts would do the trick I say the Museum displays neither CALL Till THE MUSEUM FIND OUT FOR FUR YOURSELF The telephone phone number number ris is u Ask which specific Museum exhibits display proof j as chambers really existed Have tl this s or any newspaper publish the result Then Ihm wel well we'll all sec see what's what Special pleaders imply that to investigate the gas chamber stories in the light of day will willbe willbe willbe be harmful to Jews I challenge this bigoted insinuation Free inquiry l will benefit for Jews exactly the reasons it benefits us all In any case why should it not COMMITTEE COM FOR OPEN DEBATE ON TIm TIlE HOLOCAUST is not a membership organization organisation and is not d with any political group or organization Our goal is to promote Lh free inquiry and open debate without which intellectual tr freedom can con not nol exist To those who ask Why challenge the Holocaust Museum we Why reply not challenge the J Museum We Wc are ar th the ani only ones pointing out the falsehoods ds and Uld mi misrepresentations r surrounding the Museum and the th lack of integrity of those who represent it Every Evry intellectual who visits the th Museum Ius um and particularly historians should hould point out these fuels facts to 10 you yet none dare Only Only dares to challenge the thc taboo against challen challenging ng the Museum 11 Help us monitor this growing national controversy Clip the stones run in your campusand campusand campus campusand and off campus newspaper and send COd them to us Include the name of the paper and the date the story ran In return well we'll update you on the continuing controversy Address information to PO Box nox Visalia C CA Tel Fax 2653 4 44 |