| Show WAS VAS KNOWN TO THE PLAINTIFF at least witness bitress act bitted hi ha wa addressed properly Prop arfy peter smith hid had fallen biorn art an de 1 lator ator in kanj city cio anil wa sni nhat shaken up an bauls I 1 ind cheo lie he pickel CI cina JK belf up III th only by bi stanle stanje an all utter brair tr braar air r serin ohp trona op OG hla his face ml noti noticing cirg that hi was not hurt burt i at hin hi n piter pi ter promptly calle i hint it a led d oil fool anil alli al alfi j ua fe few ali lite tle tl e dimy damage suit of 0 pete balth against th ele coni compan pin w wis 13 beilig trie I 1 it in the circuit court wherein sa said pater claimed that h ht wag a greatly injured by the fall aforesaid ato essid aa a pickel picka up f etc tc the aforesaid stranger was a witness tor for alp defend ant and testified that plaintiff was not up III but I 1 that tha t he h picked hint elf up and walked bialko off on when asked how hoi lie he knew that plain tiff nas not unconscious lie he rel rei ned lied ailt nie ne he AIS aas then asked it if plaintiff had eyer ever so seen ell him belore ind and replied in the negative nega tiie whore whereupon upon he was asked what plain tiff said to him that cited him to think that plaintiff recognized hi him m his answer quoted plaintiffs la language ngu a go to him glien above hi his reply being Hs he called me i lunk healed c old id foul fool it I 1 la needless to say bay that it took some time aln e to restore solemnity in the courtroom the green bag |
