Show 41 4 1 iara at conference uon ferenCe in sIn salt lake allotment plans flans discussed but no definite regulations drawn vern P pace ace of richfield a member of the advisory board of district no 5 under the taylor graz in act S M jorgensen of salina president and abe hansen of richfield a director of the utah wool growers grower association were in salt lake this week to attend the state conference of advisory boards and interested braziers gra held at the newhouse hotel I 1 A discussion of rules for governing the use of the range brought out many and varied opinions that will no doubt be of assistance in reaching an agreement but no definite set of regulations was adopted at the conference mr air hansen stated after his return to richfield all districts except no 8 voted for a two year priority rule which grants preference to properties which were dependent on the range for their year around operations for two consecutive years preceding june 28 1931 i or for any three years in the same period district no 8 recommended a five year priority rule approved also was the rule to grant preference to land qualified by location in relation to the range but this ruling however was opposed by mr jorgenson and S H anderson of salt lake on the grounds that the location element would ruin braziers gra who were vere ir in the habit of trailing stock long iong distances and was upheld by representatives who charged that the trailers were responsible for the overstocking over stocking of the range salt lake paper report in the final vote district no I 1 recommended the abandonment of the location rule and district no 3 recommended its modification by requiring that ranchers with location de oer be forced to participate by lio 0 tier per cent in any cut in allotments lot ments rear regarding arding the forest permit ul F R carpenter announced that the division had deemed it ad vs visible ible to abandon its former posit on which would not allow forst permits to be used in lieu of leased or patented property in the esurin k of grazing permits he baid such a harsh rule had be been n opposed in other states as it subsequently was opposed here on the grounds rounds that it would disorganize the grazing industry in the state neither he baid baid was the graz ng division willing to grant the orest forest permit holders holders full rights a bual ual to co those of the lessees lessels or landowners for the reason that that would permit them to pyramid id one government subsidy on another As a result the director proposed the rule used in oregon which bould grant forest permit tees use f the public domain under the taylor act which would be equal to the limit of the grazing time Dermit permitted ted on the particular range ninus minus the number of months of razing brazing they were already allowed n the forest service permits the proposal was defeated by a vote of six districts against two three dissenting districts offered variations on the oregon rule prominent among speakers at the conference were F R carpenter united states director of graz afi T A walters assistant s soc sc c of the interior senator elhert elbert D thomas and representative abe Al murdock mr AT r carpenter advanced t he gum ct t and explanations in favor of the proposed Dro posed modifications in grazina division lules aich he proposed as a basis for th r arst permanent perin perets its which rill be issued under the act when we make tl esa rules we wc vant to mike them good ones he declared lec lared in inviting general dis ulion of advisory board members im graz grables les nearly officials and interested d stockmen stoc kmen pt tt tended ended the sessions |