OCR Text |
Show I. G. C. APPROVES 5.RCOfJIIOL a P. AITIICATION dUMMim IN FULLi I'.UT ONE". Ml Mtll.N DISSENTS FROM OPINION TrAnsport.itton Act Cited to Justify Consolidation cf Linra; Conclusion Conclu-sion Subject to Itovlnw by Court WluMn-dm - Tho application of thft funilhoru Vaclav company to retain Its presrnt ivntol of the rental l'n-olfio l'n-olfio railroad by iwn.rsMp ot lis ntx'k and lonso of lis linos whh Hunted S::turil:iy In full. by a decision decis-ion of tho Interstate commerce com-mission. com-mission. AUhovi'h t tie supremo court In 1:.V. at tho end of eleven years of In tuition oor too ohistiiii; nioritor of tho roads hold thorn to ho u combination com-bination In restraint of competition mil otMcrod thom separated, t!u commission with hut ona member lissoiititi:---tochirod their maintain-iv maintain-iv I union whs necessary In Iho In-oros!8 In-oros!8 -f tl;o western stutos tlioy tmvorso and ttio country as :i v!io!o. Kurthor, tho majority declaiM. Iho former policy of tho nation In de-inaii.lin;; de-inaii.lin;; mnliitenaiioo. of competition .hove all othor things In transportation transpor-tation services, had been reversed ly tho congressional enactment of tho transportation act of llVO. porm'.tlln.; general consolidation of railroads tinder government sopervls. n. Cn tills ground tho maintenance of tho cieryvr of the two r. vails notulth- tending the court's decree to ho lo j::illv aulhori.e.1 and mlvlsablo in view of public necessities. Tho opinion pointed or.t. however, that tho conchisl n of tho commission commis-sion would be snVoot to review hy tho court before (hey could become :' oiivo. |