Show I C 1 I LEGAL NOTICES SUMMONS Civil No I iN TN IN THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT D DA DAVIS A V VIS I S COU COUNTY TY I STATE OF UTAH I JOHN ROB ROBERT E R T GOODWIN Plaintiff vs LOIS ELAINE BORNSCHEIN GOODWIN Defendant THE STATE OF UTAH TO THE ABOVE NAMED NAl DEFENDANT You are hereby summoned and required to serve upon or mail to plaintiffs plaintiff's attorney at Judge Salt Lake City Utah an answer in writing to the complaint and file a copy of said answer with the clerk of the above entitled court within 20 days clays after alter service of this summons summons summons sum sum- mons upon you If you fail so to todo todo todo do judgment by default will be betaken betaken betaken taken against you for the relief demanded in said complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court and a copy of which is hereto annexed and herewith served upon you If your address Is unknown to plaintiff or his attorney and the complaint is not attached to this summons it will be filed within I Isaid said 10 days with the clerk of the above court and you may there obtain a copy This is an action per attached Petition for Annulment r ri i E E. E H H. H FAN FANKHAUSER US ER I Attorney for Plaintiff Judge Building Salt Lake City Utah I Published in the Davis County I Clipper First publication May 26 1967 Last publication June 16 1967 C t I I I NOTICE i Case No 0 1894 I IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF DAVIS VIS COUNTY STATE OF OF I IUTA I UTAH UTA In the he Matter of the Adoption Of BILLY GENE COX AND il MICHAEL CHAEL EDWARD CONNORS minor children TO EDWARD CONNORS i natural father fat her of Michael M i c h a e 1 Edward Connors a minor You will please take notice that Layman J J. J Thomas and Elizabeth Thomas his wife have filed in the District Court of Davis County State of Utah Probate Division a petition on praying that an Order might be made granting leave to them to adopt Michael l Edward Connors Connors Connors Con Con- nors your minor child anu ana that on the day of July 1967 at 1000 o'clock AM A.M. in the Davis Co County u n t y Co Court CourtHouse u r t House Mouse Farmington Utah s ai aid d petition will be heard before the above entitled court to together together together to- to gether with the hearing for the determination of the fact of desertion of said minor child by yourself You are hereby notified to appear and show cause if any you Jou ha have ve why the prayer of said petitioners based upon desertion should not be granted Dated this day of May 1967 HESS PALMER VAN Alfred C. C Van Attorney for Petitioners Petition Petition- ers 40 South East Clearfield Utah Published in the Davis C County 0 u n t y Clipper First publication June 2 1967 Last publication June 23 1967 C 52 PETITION FOR ANNULMENT IN THE S SECOND E C CON O N D DISTRICT COURT OF DAVIS COUNTY STATE OF UTAH JOHN ROBERT GOODWIN Plaintiff vs LOIS E ELAINE LAIN E BORNSCHEIN GOODWIN Defendant Comes now the above named plaintiff and petitions the Court as follows 1 That he is an actual and bona fide resident of Davis County State of or Utah and has been for more than three 3 months prior to the commencement commencement commencement commence commence- ment of this action 2 That plaintiff and defendant on or about June 28 1958 and each of them executed a aSpe special Special Special cial Power of Attorney for the purpose of contracting matrimonial matrimonial matrimonial matri matri- bonds by proxy to each other which marriage was to tobe be performed In the State of Morelos Morelos Morelos More- More los Republic of Mexico 3 That at the time of the execution execution execution exe exe- cution of the Special Power of Attorney as aforesaid the parties hereto were residents and citizens of the City of San Bernardino and the State of California USA U.S.A. 4 That no children have been born by reason of the purported union between plaintiff and defendant defendant de defendant de- de and none are expected 5 That the plaintiff herein acquired certain property prior to and during said purported marriage which property was in the possession of defendant and has been sold or otherwise disposed by the defendant 6 That prior to the time of the alleged celebration of the marriage between the parties as aforesaid plaintiff was married married married mar mar- ried and had attempted a Mexican Mexican Mexican can divorce by proxy from his then said wife However plaintiff plaintiff plaintiff plain plain- tiff has been informed and believes believes be believes be- be that the purported di divorce divorce di- di vorce was in fact never performed performed performed per per- formed or if such divorce was in fact performed that the same was a nullity in that said di divorce divorce divorce di- di vorce would not have been recognized recognized recognized rec rec- by the State of California Califor Califor- nia and therefore your plaintiff could not legally and lawfully contract a marriage to the defendant defendant de defendant de- de herein Further plaintiff believes upon information and belief beller that the purported Mexican marriage by proxy between the parties was in fact never perform performed performed per per- formed form d and if said marriage was in fact performed by proxy J the same was a nullity in that such marriage could not be valid in the State of California as a matter of law and by reason reason reason rea rea- son thereof and by re reason as on of the invalid divorce of plaintiff as aforesaid the Court should an annul annul annul an- an nul and declare said marriage void and of no force orce and effect whatsoever r and that the parti parties es hereto go their separate ways 7 That defendants defendant's maiden name was Bornschein and that said name should be restored to her WHEREFORE plaintiff prays Judgment as follows 1 That the Court declare that the purported marriage between the parties herein be null and void and of no force I and effect whatsoever and I I awarding plaintiff a decree of annulment 2 That defendant be restored to her former name of Bornschein Born Born- 3 For such other and further relief as the Court deems proper prop prop- er in the pre premises E E. E H H. H FANKHAUSER Attorney for Plaintiff Judge Building Salt Lake City Utah STATE OF UTAH COUNTY OF SALT LAKE JOHN JOlIN ROBERT GOODWIN being first duly sworn dep dp S Sand and says That he is the plaintiff plaintiff plaintiff plain plain- tiff in the above d action that he has read the foregoing Petition and knows the contents thereof and that th the same r true of his own knowledge ex excepting excepting excepting ex- ex as to those matters therein stated upon Information and belief bellef and as to those he believes them to be true JOHN ROBERT GOODWIN Subscribed and sworn to be before before before be- be fore me this day of December December December Decem Decem- ber 1966 EPHRAIM If H. H F FANKHAUSER Notary Public Residing at Salt Lake City Utah SEAL My Commission expires Oct 10 1967 Published in the Davis County Clipper C 50 I First First public publication tion May 26 1967 Last publication June 16 1967 I I |