OCR Text |
Show C.r.u.d W Klrn- .!A!ie '! . i- c:i . :r. . i'.r.i,nrte. M-iMm! ir.i lit .Je'v 4" 1 .t;.!:m V4 ati-i R O V li)- it.: !m M ;ei. ,;; and V S My ton. 43 . it.iiauV JoiiovsJ iv Siewait et al, I Saxey and Wiutecotton; Thuiman and King. 4Q United Slates vs L A Scott Klliott; equity; U S Attoir.tv; Thutman and Kins. 5 ' Charles Crane vs B Watts ti al, e;( utv; L) Eavens and S R Thur-man; Thur-man; George Sutherland. 51 Silas Reed vs Geoige Peaison et al; equity; A Ct Suthetland; Bennette and lkadely. 52 Gsbnel Huntsman vs Fillmore City; equity;S R Thuim.in and George Suther- , land; Slieeks and Rawlings and W II King 53 Anna Whatcott, vs A Wstcott divnice; ASaxey; U Evans. 54 ami 55 Bullion, Beck & Champion Mining Co vs F K Moms;eiinty; Arthur litown; Uenn-ette Uenn-ette and Bradely. 56 F K Morris, vs Hull-Beck Hull-Beck and Cal Mining Co; equity; lienu-etle lienu-etle ion, and llladely; Arthur Blown. 57 l.ouis B..iikofsy vs John Gieen, equity; VV J Syuder, Bennette and Bradely. Court Calendar. V.'iHit si I) tlono at fh' Of lite First District Court itt I'rovo. A Heavy Crist of United Stivte aes. Follow ing are the cases set lor the Sepltmbti leini. I'SITEl) STATES CRIMINAL CASUS. The United States vs I William R. Mav, unlawful rohabita- I tion; Attorneys, U S Attorney; Thuiinaii 1 & King. 2 F. V. Cluistenson, misde- I ineanoi;US Attorney ;set for trial Sep- f tember 27tli. 3 George VV Gee, unlaw- S lul cohabitation; United Slates Attorney; J Thuiman & King. 4 ohu C Giabain, nnl. infill cohabitation; U S Attorney I Th imaii tSi King sU P.iije, misde- v meaiioi; U S Attorney; Jacob J ohnson. :' 6 E VV Fox, misdemeanor U S Attorney; t Jacob Johnson; set for ttial Sepiember , 27th. 7 Casper Cliritensoii, misde- ' nieanor; U S Atlorney; set fur trial Sep tember 27th. 8. ) L Peacock, misdemean- or; U S Attorney; VV K Keid; set for trial September 27th. 9 Nicholas II Groes-beck.adulterv.US Groes-beck.adulterv.US Atty.;ThurnianKing. in William Kicker, uulawlul cohabitation; cohabitat-ion; U S Attorney Thutman & King. 11 William iai.Kei, ouuiiciv, yj -J .himiuv.,, Thuiman & King. 1 2 Pleasant S Bradford, Brad-ford, uulawlul cohabitation; U S Aitor- iev; Thurman & King. i3Ge rge Stagg, unlawful cohabitation; U S Attorney. 14 Piter Okleberry, adultery; U S Attorney; Attor-ney; Thurman !v King 15 C C A Chris-tensoii, Chris-tensoii, unlawful cohabitation; U S Attorney At-torney Thuiman & Kuig. 16 M ihowie I Bishop, adultery; U S Attorney; Tnur-man Tnur-man it King 17 William H Ashby, adul-teiy;U adul-teiy;U S Attorney; Thuiman King; sei for trial Sepiember r yt ti. IS H B Boun-ttt, Boun-ttt, adulteiv; V S Ati.ntiev; X'hu 1 m.m X King. 19 Hvniiii iJcwsuip, adultery; U S Attorney; liiuinian & King. 20 Hea-son Hea-son Lewis, unlawful cohabitation: U S Attorney; Thutman & King- 21 Thomas Featherstone, uulawlul cohabitation; U S Attorney, Thuiman & King; set lor September 19111. 22 William S -vuh-wick, unlawful cohabit.nion;US Attorney: Tiiurmaii&Kiiii;; set for Septeniber ly ill 23 Peter K l.eiiini on, unlawful cohabitation; cohabita-tion; U S Attorney; Thurman & King; set for September 19th. 24 George , Hales, uulawlul cohabitation; U S Altotney; Thurinan et Kiirg.-3wn j Hales, p.lygamy; U S attorney; Thui- i man & King. 5 TFKKITOK1AL CASKS. The Dist Any. appears l-jr lh people i The people vs. i I Goo VV. 11 uicock et al, murdei; At torneys, Uistiict Atioiney; Thuiiiian & King. 2 J.is Chadwick et al guild lar-"' lar-"' c iuy; Geo Kutlieilai.d. 5jas Cliadwick 1- -al grand larceny, Geo Suthetland. set . .1 C- ... . ..... -I lor ti, al hept 25th INeits iNeiisen appeal, jl ,.)tli& Wilson, set for Sent aotli. 5 Win i Itrock. niurdai; Arthur Hiown; set for j Sept 25nd. ft John - llanafeer, appeal; J et for Sept 201 h 7 Win R. Mav, ap- ' pt;al; Saxev A VVhrtecotton. SFillm ue f Gitv vs Gabriel Huntsman, a peal; W,H. King; Thurman Sutherland. 9 Alpine City vs. Chester Paddock, appeal; S K. Thurman; A. Saxev. to Citv ol Richfield Rich-field vs. Vui Clark, appeal; for defendant, defend-ant, A. Saxev. 11 & 12 Spruigville vs David Fordoiiskt, appeal; riiurniiu 6: King; Saxey & Wiutecotton, 13 Mi. Pleasant vs. Gustay Johnson, appeal; Jacob Johnson Geo Sutherland. 14 15 & 16, Springville vs lames F McClellan, appeal; Thuinuii-Kuig; Saxey-White- ColtOII. CIVIL CALANUER. United States vs, 1 H Smith et al, law; Attorneys, U. S Attorney, S, K. Thurman & Geo Sutherland. Suther-land. 2tk i Jos. Page et al, U. S, Attorney, Attor-ney, Jacob Johnson. 4 Jot 1 ri VV. 5hep-heid 5hep-heid et al, U. S. Attorney Henrv Adams & Jacob J ihmon. 5 & 6 S, M- Williams et al.U, 5 Attorney. Wm K. Reid. 7 Emma J. Clark et al, U. S. Attorney M. M kellogg. 8 E. VV. Fox et al. U. S. Attornev, Jacob Johnson. 9 &10 (. A. Murd.ick et al, U. S. Attorney. 11 Sutherland Suth-erland adminstrator of estate of Jam cs Rohbins vs Don C Sagers; George Sutherland. 12 H. Woodrurt vs. C.Lyons, appeal; S, VV, Daike, A G. Suthetland. 13 Annie Marks vs-John T. Sullivan et al, E ans, Varian, Sutheiland. Hoge Buimester 15 VV.S McComick vs. Wm Clirk et al.Tliiinnan & King & George Sutherland. 7 Pr vo City vs. . C. V irk appeal; S R, Tmiiman. John B. nlilner IS Alviu L. Robinson vs. Hans Esklund Thurman & King & Geo Sutherland, J. L. G-les. 19 Herbert iiai t al, vs. American Fork City, Thurman & King & GeoSuilierland and I. G. Sutherland, W. H. Dickson and U. E ans. J. K. R. Sieele vs. T L Holey et al, A Saxey Geo Su'hterlaud' 21 Ephraim Nash vs. Sch field Bros Thuiman & Kinjf and Ge 1 Sutherland, JacoS Johnson, Arthur Hr own and Henry Adams. 22 Provo Coop Co-op Institution vs. St V Le Sier; Thurman Thur-man and King and Ge 1 Sutherland; G V Poweis. 23 Kate McNeal vs li W Uriges.Jr., et al Frank I'eiceand VVhi-tem VVhi-tem .re VV H Dickson, 24 Smith Ehrin-iiiirer Ehrin-iiiirer et al vs Anchor Miuiim Co; J R Mcbride; Benneli & Bradley 25 Iia C Kennelly vs.Ancli r Mining Co. W C Hall Renur't and Biadley. 26 james M Kennel Ken-nel v vs. Anchor Mining Co., V C.llall lianiiett .iid Biadley. 27 C S Va-ri Va-ri 111 et id vs. Centriiiij.il E.iirk.i Mining C , C S Variai ; Bennett and Bradiey. 2S M iV Davies et al vs Ed Huies. 29 Jared VV Rmindv vs, M E Crand ill et al , S iinerla- d and Judd; Thurman anl Kin?. 30 Michae1 L Powers vs. J. S Giles 31 Luis Claik vs lleniy Nc- belter; appeal; D. S. liana; b L Page 3a Mtmnoih Min.nifCovs Matthew Con-d.)h, Con-d.)h, llennette & Biadcly! Krank Hoff man .VI The Histoiv Co vs S C Eiufc', M M Kelloar ; Anhur llruvvn. 34 Charles OIeu, vs iMclvin Smith; appeal. 35 Sam uel Cox vs The Genuine Mining- Co, (ieniRe Sutherland; Bennett & Uradley. 16 Wm H Paiton, vs Eh opeuliorn et al; M M Kelloji; Thmman & Kin. 37 " S vs JL Peacock, et al U S Attoinev; Wm K Reid 38 Mary A May, vs Charles Mouse; Saxey it Wiutecotton. 39 Wm H Litter, vs Ozokerite Miuiug Co; M M Kellng; Thurman, & King. 40 Robert Rob-ert F Ross, vs Chrisie Lee; appeal; D Evans, 41 A E Merriam vs San Pete Valley R R Cc;W K Reid;P L Williams, 42 Neilse L Elliason, vs Henry F Dan els et al; Wm Zabriskie; Wm K Reid. 43 HyrumBardm et al; M'rhatl Hollarm! George Sutherland; J Rojers. 44 F A Russell vsjolin Sullivan, constable of Tintic precinct; Stephens and Schroder: J S Watts and C L Brown, 45 Anna Marks vs W II Culmer et al ; Varian; Evans, Sutherland and Thurman; J vj Sutherland and Arthur Browu. 45 R' t1 t |