Show FOURTH DIS DISTRICT C COURT OU ao u s eject ejectment ment suit Dis dismissed on a technicality 1311 burmese less IV was as very 6 r dull in judo audgo 0 31 miners iners court yest yesterday tray as a natural sequence quence ee of tile preceding holiday no new suite suits were filed and only one jury case caw was disposed of when court opened at the usual I 1 hour lour tit alie e ebee ejectment t men t su suit it of it J hawthorne ve vs philip purser continued from wed nedday was called for trial only one witness had been examined when the defense moved for a non suit on a technicality claiming that the complaint faint I 1 in ejectment had been filed ill three reo S days y before the patent to the tile land was issued to the tile plaintiff the allegations having been boen sustained the judge ordered the tile case dismissed and the tile jury discharged by consent of the defense an all amended complaint was filed and tile case w will ill now take tile regular course the do defendant accepted service waived summons and took twenty days to answer the int interested ere ted parties t 10 are residents of cache county adar and alio 1 lands and in contest are located in the same district the plaintiff alleges that he lie owns a certain piece of real estate upon which purser has lias squatted by virtue of a patent from the united states land office he ile sues for an ejectment and dama damages in tile damage ge cabe u of william driver et al vs thomas 8 stayner ct et a al tile defendant was granted thirty days further time to file motion for a new trial or bill of exceptions in ili the case of nicolino nicoline farr parr ve vs J 11 II stallings ct al an order was entered allowing tile complaint to be amended |