Show 41 1 it F iliff djs the church suit proceedings 0 caso I 1 OP or SE L A Z ita mum ch fined fifty rollan add cueli bleary J stuman et it inso lusts to yesterday was lr law and motion day in the first dietrict dittri ct court colart and a great deal of hoe boal loess nees wa was gone throng ahe 1 he church suit wherein the tide title to tho the northwest corner cf of union senaie su at a Is iivo ved was get set for or 10 ol lorb hut but when called it waa was toned found that L grande yunn yung was unable to be io in attendance and upon motion m tion cl of charles S hanm altoney fir f r the receiver and by consent of city attorney iha wa was p until january 5 1891 thia this euit suit was brought by it celver dyer iyer to recover iacov er property aich bid bad ben hen asly deeded by the church ch arch to oilen ogden city for a certain consideration coo the receiver claim the right to tie trio lan I 1 1 I I 1 by f ilie be pier vested ve filed in lim by th various law laws which bato have been pabst paid d at sat different times afe case of the united states vs lna lite P jihnson Jb with unlawful cobabe tation anje as railed called II 11 R 1 ipp ipp represented the defendant to Jali teMi erh deafen obey all unita states laws re wardin 9 a 8 ch of fences and was sentenced to b he penitentiary for the term of two mouths months and to pay the costs of the pro fred ella was charged with adultery and find when arraigned rl pl paled bilty vi he the accusation judge miner f illow wj hib his of lett bettink inic ti alis Is claa clas of offenders off aa as ey easy ia As possible when they pl 0 aa guilty alty ant anil sentenced fenten teaten ced bim him to tile ush g batile brixy days the rho next cate ca called eo 00 na nal what of a surprise gurp surp rite and was out of the general run tun henry J newman was arra orra igal d on a hige hi ge of 0 no lawful co nud end pleaded guilty gull y but when aked a ked by the court i 1 I be i promise to obay tho the law inthe ii the future he lie ahw ered that he bad bail in thai re iford t ard nai itai taken in h hand and by his attorney mr sir lii lipp who labored with him in eve y wai wa possible but to no purpose the former cm eni nned tined firm and would not chanke hii his mind the audgo ox in ed d him litin and mr sir newman saiu satu that if the doctrine bad had been true before the manifesto to did cot not change it now miner aid that under the circumstances lie w would 0 11 be b forced to ala inister the law aa with severity verity ee tie ile sentenced ilie the defendant to five months in the penitentiary and to p kiy ty a fine of and to in default d of payment to ba imprisons it until old paid on motion of charles S varian Var lau another clout aga nit not mr for ai altery was A Z Vati oarn WM was for sentence Mn tence having previously been convicted of battery upon the that body of james oa on the morn cidh of 2 id in judge miner sentenced iced him to py pay a fine of 50 0 and costs and in default t pAy maut to be imprisoned fifty diya days lie ile paid the fine chariot Turn erth erthe colored man who was a c ed on friday ot of burglary wa coma iwed on oa the inora tug of november an I 1 in hurt bart bros store star was also brought before the tile bar to receive ro bis his little dose the j ide idge eave gave the prisoner three years ye in n which to think over 0 v e r his b I 1 a misdeeds m I 1 a de e d a olt og ten n cay railway camp iny vs II 11 1111 II 11 henderson proceeding eding for contempt set fir far january 0 1891 on motion mo tion of hiles beeson vs beeson on motion of 11 A breeden and by colasent of male diey fy ad case referred to II 11 11 hilll lapp 5 J ii SI anderson And ereon vs F J kiesel A company c cam pany 1 on of smith and Sal sulieti itil J al linghor Ling Langs Jor dorl substituted ai as plaint plaintiff IT J 1 emm vs W G child it motion of smith and smith to amend order of refer reference e nee order overruling morim D william hill vs city of wellsville motion for a pew trial on coo contempt coal empt tempt car reset for bearing hearing january 1891 il elissa smith vs vaa k 9 W scott et al demur demurrer to 10 compla complaint Mt overruled ten dayt ti ansar ans pr dw W V L P 1 payton pay ton WM was admitted to the bir lie KW wao examined by rans ford smith L it rogers and M A breeden Br craig vs E A laz order orde r for four ds das sty stay of so alis a s lis o and suit la to the mp meantime antime t b bid 1 I no iala ali to iob b I 1 yon poll boned until 17 martha awne et at va martha IV stone et al order for dec decree ee |