Show judge julge jadd judi rises to remark the following pointed were rustle by judda judd in la the church property investigation at salt lake lik s yesterday A at ta I 1 later ater lall lull la in the formal proceedings ce jaja jadd judd took occasion to express hie his opinion in regard to the forfeiture of the temples 1 tU outside taide of this city and of the tithing pr propst op r ties in various parts of the terr territory tory lie ile thought they could not be reachel under the edmunds tucker law bs be cue that applied to the church as a whole whereas these temples and tithing properties were owned locally by corporations or natural persons pe reone in a I 1 legal egal sense wholly distine from the church it if these properties tee owned locally in this tills matter are to be pursued and es cheated the proceeding must be brought under the act of qt 1802 which make it unlawful for any ecclesiastical organizations to acquire more than worth of real property if the to temples in pies and tithing properties are 0 owned by local ec ecclesiastical clest organizations they can be es cheated under the act of 1862 but sa d the judge if it I 1 were the united states a attorney tt orney id plant actions ac alone against so somebody in besides the Mor hormone mons theres the catholic church its got a good deal more real property than the law allows the methodist church here owns worth of real property and dont use it for religions religious purpose either theres the key rev mr air con linued judge judd he gets up every sunday and nd vents hie life venom on the tile cormons mormons Mor mons but bis his church is violating the law all all the time it has a great deal more real estate than thin the law allows I 1 in respect to the personal property of the mormon church continued the judge 1 I never thought it right to take that there was no law against it it was comprised of the little offerings which the mormons cormons laid on the altar of their church aad and every dollar of it ought to be returned to the p people 0 who contributed contribute d it I 1 consider the d doctrine of cipri tf under der which judge bradley firsts h held 1 it could be confiscated an absurdity as BO so a applied 11 i itts it Is certainly anew a new application of that doctrine remarked judge stone |