OCR Text |
Show DECLINE NOTED 1 1N SUGAR BEETS I Decline Greatest in Cali-vl Cali-vl fomia; Utah Drops 25 Per Cent. A jraln of '; i; p uni. in the condl- Jon of the sinvr beet .Top ill the Jnltc-1 St.it. v . 1 1 . r i n uirus1 is re-ported re-ported by the liur.' ill ii crop est- mat. ' ' ' , . 1 1 in in its crop re- I lort fot Set. uiber i . i mdltion ftf HU he br ' t , utire COUDtry wns vx i. p. r . .ni i.f normil I k September 1, ag.inst 85 per cent n AuK'i.xt 1 The Septembei i ondl-fl ondl-fl Hon. however is b t 8 p- ) tern be r 1. !mM .:ir. which was 90.4 I percent, and . '- b. w the I ayi i t IVerage. for v t i , I . . which (s g r 1 per cent On the ba.cls of :m ,i erri-.'e . ondi-I ondi-I tlon of 8 sc, per (;,(. department A u agrlcu - nets a yii Id of I 69 tons i.f i i 'ni ,,, total 1 bop of 5.269 ma o) b( I pred with ;m estimated broj) I 2.00(1 tons lasi year and a crop lU'' " v i .1 ii ;. in the ctorl t T.4M.00O tons. As compared wlth the Au -tlmate this is .m Incn IIS. oo i i ..H4. Th j leld pi r lore r i ' r.- ... iod Is 9.49 !on-. Calculating he sugar recovery at 12. e weight ol bei ts ar i rn for the nst t.-n , s... ru ni itat-1 ! I., i prod ion i .p. ,.. led or'"' ' ' r ' h 1 en I .. .1 " 1 ' . ibou! Wo- . i as v ear's leld I 1 i beets Hp year is 74.4 'per it of t i 193 i rr . iTbf estimated I t vo id and crop Con ' ' Condition Estimated H Sept. I, beel crop. . . nl t i -' F'1' j Iflr h '-'I " Michigan 85,0 7:3.00019 Ohio 80 0 208,000 rl Wisconsin 87 o s7 000 other states S9.0 538.000 M 88.6 5.265 000 gfi The decrease in tonnage indicated 1 1 by thi foregoing estimate is grem- b esl as ompared with last oar, In H California, when- it amounts to over ffl 0 i" i ent The decrease In Colo- H r.olo ; ;i p.-r cent in Utah '.'' per H cent In Idahb, M per cent in N e- n braska, .t l p r cenl lb Michigan, 85 9 i" cent In Ohio, 1 per cent, on I ra in Qthes .-lares 8.5 per cent. H oo 9 |