Show supreme court proceedings at the supreme court on thursday chief justice hunter and justice emerson nd boreman elizabeth M townsend IT hooper et al respondents appellant upon the suggestion ofa B ough for the respondent of a dim the record in this cause anil on the consent of counsel of the respective martias par it is ordered that respondents rany file in this and uge in this hearing such exhibits court as were used in the district court motion for a new trial and designated on as marked by letters A to inclusive J R respondent vs iron county appellant this case comine oa regularly for hearing wag argued by fc now esq for appellant J B and dilley esq for respondent submitted and taken under adrue men t by the court jas E bromley etal trustees pel lants vs henry raymond p et u respondents this case regularly for coining oa hearing was R K harkness esq for argued by appellants ind for respondents submitted aej ment taken auder adrig the manufacturing company respondents vs abram casl mers et al appellants this coming on regularly for bearin wo ewas arg aed by ben Slie eks esq for appellant and r marsha forre spona n court adjourned until friday morning at 11 proceedings friday june 25 on motion of R and it satisfactorily p thil bernard loth has been duh admit it is ordered that he ba practice in abia court to christopher anderson ent osjas V stevens elci appellant arguments ia this cause concluded and case submitted and taken under elizabeth L kinney appellant vs hannah lewis respondent this kruso coming on regular for hearing eras argued by A esq for Ut and T G sutherland esq for respondent and submitted ind taken under adjourned till today at 11 am ay june ag heber Bankhe tl jain aff and bellant el lant va anion pacific ap kompany om pany defendant and benl submitted and taken ly tho tho victor sewing SI achino com defendant ind appellant vt geo W crockwell el al and respondents and taken under advisement by court ad till biondi june |