OCR Text |
Show II oo iV PROFIT-SHARING I IN 5MRGED A Beet Growers to Propose '50- 50' Proposition With i J Producers sjfHB The report of the -near heel com ckHhJ mlttcc is expected to be one of the I most interesting features of tbc an-i iMB utial convention ot the l lah state gHHbI farm bureau In Salt Lake early next ' l -lBB month. sfflH James R BeuS Is chairman of this; jffwfl committee and will read the report of! X.jflB the work accomplished to date Includ jJJBM ing llie developments in the proposed! -i '9B profit-sharing plan for beel growers' BT jTl and sugar manufacturers. T Under this proposed plan tlicrr .yvfcS would be nn lived oi guaranteed price l-Jpi ror beets rht 1 rmert wanl shan 'tfjl rty-fiftj in it"' profit ol Kb Industry tHHj It is the contention of the farmers'1 BjIV organization that the cost of growing jsffl sugar beets and the cost ol sucar pro J H2H duclion are equal and therefore the I 5jH jiroiiiv -Mould l shared equall The farmers propose that thr ba.sir. H seaboard price oi sj;u tor one rljH whether the sugar companies sell or hold their sugar. , jEH It is understood that the sugar SyjB companies have attacked the figures ! submitted by the farmers as to how 4&Hl much it costs the growers to product , (fi beets And the growers are conduct Ing an Investigation to determine, H whether the sugar company's figures j jliHssl on the cost ol production are correct.' BH The sugar operators are said to be j lflH of the opinion that the prolli sharing $fH should be on B 47 53 basis, with the HHH tanners rcceiinK the lesser share. S&HH When the farmers' sugar beet com- jp&vJ mlttee completes its Investigations a, . definite proposition Will be made to I I iht Bugar c panj and t h me ttei bM' .sin be threshed oul ai a conference DB between representatives of the farm . fl it - .i mi the repreBentativi H sugar companies. |