Show WHY NOT TEST TH THE E BOYCOTT I IN OGDEN I Samuel Gompers and his colleagues who disregarded the courts inJunction tion In the case of the Buck Ranse t Stove company and w were re held to tobe tobe be in contempt o of court are arc facing the doors o of tho jail In Washington o decision rendered by br a court In years has bad such a disturbing of er feet in labor circles as this ono one There Is but ono one thing for the la laboring boring men to do and that Is retaliate b forcing every trust in the tho country countr to lo cease to boycott intimidate or coerce or send the tho beads or of those predatory organizations to jail If it is good law to throw labor Jabor lead leaders i Irs ers In prIson for haYing having advocated or in any way a abetted a 1 boycott then to continuo to be good goodlaw goodlaw law the hand or of justice must rest as ash h heavily on those who being within a trust truEt would boycott all outside of their particular trust It has been en shown that our Io local al sro gro grocers cers trust has bas practiced the boycott at least has used coercive and Intini measures to force Independent I Grocers to enter the combine Now the labor unions In self published the tilO Stove house as unfaIr yet cl tho they did not go so far ns as to threat threaten I on en an any one with direct Injury ns as that would IH have been boen nn an undisguised boy I 1 coat cott For that open advocacy of what I they th deemed to be the rIght or of free speech Gompers and his associates were sentenced If IC Gompers and the theother theother other labor lenders leaders have havo acted In vio vin of law b by merely offerIng ad adIce adice Ice In what category of lawbreakers I are arc Tie we to place the heaths heads of the tho den trust Instead of the laboring men through throughout out the tho striking In hr protest t against the h of this punish punishment ment all on Samuel John Mitch oil en and mui Frank we advisee That they demaud In ever eer city Il and hamlet In this land the same samo interpretation tation and enforcement ot of the law In Inthe inQ inthe Q the curbing o of combines which resort to coercion I Ogden should send in answer to the order or of the court o of appeals or of the tho District of a message reading something Org Organized lab labor r Ip in this 1 ls cep is 19 r about rut ul to tot t t l O our l decision I i nile and that of oC l in the con contempt tempt of court proceedings and this day un tut action chargin 1 n t lo local al with an offense In restraint of trade has been sl If the Ja ha Jai habor i bar bor bodies ar are an unlawful tut ful net act In u urging their membership 1 to refrain in fro from l a trust der dc Glared to lo lw he 1111 unfair fall then how much greater gremO Is the offending of those wit with within h hIn In a who openly or secretly tI i coerce Inns or There Thero II is n a pas In those two i cass cases from which there Is no JC If Gompers has hils offended then our lo 10 local cal grocers In their com combine lne have haI orr f The rhe law by applied to aU all parts of Country might soon I make it for fOI labor lubor unions I to even een consider er the advisability of I meeting exceptionally aggravating nUng lil Ih bar bor disputes with a radical resort to anything approaching a concerted effort ef effort fort at in |