| Show REASON FOR CHANGE IN SCHOOL DISTRICTS GIVEN there has been considerable question concerning tile the reason tor for the change in the school districts the reason according to the board of 0 county commissioners Is one of more equal representation under the former plan of districting fillmore flowell Fl owell holden and scipio with more than a third of the population had only one school board member while oak city lynndyl lynndal slid and leamington leavington Lea with only a little over a ninth of tile the population had the same representation this was obviously unequal and unfair on a basis of population it was impossible to mahe inake exactly equal districts the only reasonable course therefore theio fore yes was to make it on oil a basis of population and geographical location tile the board considered tho the various possibilities and determined the following as being the most practical tho the table also shows the relative population of the districts according to the votes cast in the general election in 1934 district no I 1 meadow kanosh snake valley district no 2 fillmore flowell Fl owell 50 district no 3 oak city lynndyl lynndal Lynn dyl leamington leavington Lea holden set plo DL district strIct no 4 1 deseret hinckley oasis 69 abraham 48 district no 5 delta woodrow 68 sutherland 89 it will be noted that the total is and that the totals tor for the various districts are as follows no 1 I no 2 no 3 no 4 and no 5 |
