Show OPINION gnp NEW LAW lanar DRAWS RAW S IN INQUIRY QUIlly FROM CO ATT bRNE Y OF BEAVER 4 A AL atty t tty t y 6 gen en barnes jias ivell V the following opinion on the mat ter of poll tax tak collections to 0 conn C aim A tw 1 ty tv 7 attorney torney qt wui wm F knox 0 of f bea beav v i vor i your favor received receive d wherein where ill i y you ask my opinion i us as to whelk t ae or arx riot 0 o r apoll a tax can cabbe bo collect i f a 0 ifor this yell year U ander t d e r eh the e py pro 0 f i yv visions 01 0 chapter 11 8 laws of istah IJ tah 1909 it is 13 impossible 1111 poss ma for ll 11 the ie county road Coni missioner to td comply CO ID ply strictly with the pro pj 9 vis vs ons 0 of f section cli apter or of the lassof la law wao utah 1909 1 I do not think however that the div i 1 1 ing of the notice required in see sec tion 7 is a necessary essEry preliminary Q to the collection colle oft lieta R jc hafid an d I 1 think that the tax may be co col i f J lecter and aid should le he catl looted T even though such notice has bus not nob ir bleil civoli I 1 would suggest lia W I 1 orbr eibi that thata a notice IlUtiCe ll liht be div i ert ell the 1011 ion made under such ti notice otice 1141 |