OCR Text |
Show . m I JUSTICE COURT, Thorn havo bco'i somo Import tnt and Interesting esses before JtiRtleo Chatlerloy lately. We ilo not hnvo lefercnce to the cases ofdrnnks of which there hue been a few, hut to tho ono wheroln e tnr City waa plnii tiff and .Tumes Walker defen- dat t. Iho defondni t was a nested for disturbing a public gathering on tho 20h of Dtumlxr to this iliuri o heentered it plea of not cuilty. A Jury was nt'd (or nnd tho trial proceeded. Alter th" ev idonii" tho Jury iotir d nnd deliberated (or norly four linniv but fai ed to ngicu and the case was chard for iho tjnif bol g, It will be takm upaguln ln about tun days. Davis vh Bkiir v fuot. In tho .lutco Court, Cedar Precinct, Iron Co Utah, Boo DavU. Plalntltra H A Berry and J S. Bnriy, tiefoiul.ints Judgment by tho cuuit, tho 8th day of Junuurv, A. U, IS'.X). This cause enme before the Court on tho sixth day of Jantli'y A. D. 1801 John M BroTii Esip. tppvu'ing scoun sol for pi intilT , und Presly Dunnv Enj for thodefendrint, A Irlul by jury having been exi reesly waived by the respective purlio',tho causu was "tried hcfoio 'he Court without a my, wlicreii"in witness o- on the part ot the plaintiff wero duly sworn and oxiiinicod, nnd dociln onturv evido io Introdtk'i'd by the plaintiff, atd Iho uvtdencd being clnscd, th cuu-'o was sulimitttd t tho Court for consideration und ('eels! n, and after duo deliberation thereon Out Court fl'i h it findings and deci-Ion In writing, and order that judg-men judg-men in favor f defondent rod nuui si tho tirUlntiirtii aci'ordunco thurew th. Wberefoio. bv re son of tho law and finding afoicsal J, it Is ordered njudgmott and decree tlmt It, A. Berry and J S. Iforry, the drfendutits do havo and recover re-cover of ItecsDiivlso the plaintiff nil of said defendants costs and iiisburemenU incuried in th rction, uinrnnting to too 00 to dcfo dtiit U' d o;h r ioM-" (411, 75 .'nliri t huttvdey Just'i: f the Peaco Lidnr 1'iecluo.. |