Show i t i- i o l t J J J 1 I I I I J 1 Chicago A 7 du according lo In f Is lie ie 4 Jn Indication off the the- h 4 f of or the sub Sill 44 4 robbery obber chicago 4 g- g 44 4 4 Caa 5 or of till lii sitti- sitti 44 4 I 4 t I. I atlon at l Hie H federal leal l building 44 4 I 4 tonIght tI the com ln 4 f Ioli that the hie h man who took look f ft t 4 I 17 7 from thi l lal t tV I V hu had hud studied t 1 the ill n t tho o f ff f- f St. St Louis sub tr sub u. u t 1 e lii 6 ra waH taken and ill 4 had II ml hl his conform t I fn rn espee every e C o rC ru ruling 1 of Or the court t In ca ease case L fl t 4 44 the 4 h he ito might take lake 11 mon mon- money f ff 1 f 4 It and 1100 n face lice ItCO HIP 01 44 4 4 music lc l leaving a gO t fn 4 U H- H Hi tI i to show that thE money nofle OnlY had 4 f- f been mIM r i I 4 f f Tb The decision h lh St St. Louis Loul 44 4 4 ca t n as that a n who halt had halti 4 i f lh tuf f cure care of or the Iw ou d not 44 4 4 t of b held for tol t 4 4 1 T the d disappeared 44 4 4 hl hh care can it Ite could 44 4 4 lJ bl t vii hu that lint t tie lif had JI 44 4 4 j ell It It It 4 4 f tt f 4 4 tf 4 4 1 |